AI Rate Professor

Economics

Charles Brough

ECONOMY50 · ECON50 · ECON1A · ECONOMICS · MACROECONOMICS · ECON · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can , and a lecture style many students find unclear.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyTough GraderConfusing LecturesHigh WorkloadAvoid If Possible
  • , and low grading leniency.
  • A few students say he knows the subject and can be interesting, but negative experiences dominate.
  • There is no online evidence, and all feedback comes from in-person economics courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and almost no one earning top grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course content is made harder , and difficult essay or free-response exams.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person economics reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but students imply lectures matter because .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly define an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and a lack of useful preparation.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call him a and describe difficult tests with weak curves or limited .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe a and broad preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most comments say lectures are boring, confusing, opinion-heavy, or not useful for .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

and essay questions as the main assessment burden.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are , and limited support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say exams are very hard and poorly supported by lectures or study help.

What students said

“Does not give any insight for you prepare for test. STUDY ALL.”
ECON50
“ and purposely difficult, no supplemental material is given to help your grade and to prepare.”
ECON1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove book rules or .

Test HeavyHard TestsEssay QuestionsPoorly Worded Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unclear preparation, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyHard TestsEssay Questions
“the the whole test.”
ECON50
“ and purposely difficult”
ECON1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Find another instructor if possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Teaching style sucks and rambles on about personal opinions and philosophy.”

🧪

18/100

“ and purposely difficult, no supplemental material is given to help your grade and to prepare.”

⚖️

15/100

“The . The and doesn't help anyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is not a good note giver he literally writes all over the board so you don't know which notes go with what
  • His lectures are very boring and long.
  • This guy made the class more interesting than I thought it could be.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No one in my class left with an A, and the highest grade on all of the tests was an 81.
  • , and .
  • Class was boring. .

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Experience

  • Literally he sucked and doesn't care if you pass or not.
  • Find another instructor if possible.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of and poor student experience.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ECON505 reviews
ECON1A4 reviews
ECON1 review
ECONOMICS1 review
ECONOMY501 review
Show 1 more courses
MACROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values