AI Rate Professor

Counseling

David Shoemaker

GS53 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him if you want a and and participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpfulHighly RecommendedEngagingReading Required
  • Students describe him as kind, supportive, and easy to approach.
  • The course seems low pressure, but at and participation matter.
  • Evidence is very positive but limited .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The reviews suggest a manageable class, but there is not enough grade evidence to call it an automatic A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students describe the class as comfortable and engaging, though reading and participation are mentioned.

Only in-person reviews exist, so course easiness is based entirely on that format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Participation matters is mentioned, but the reviews .

Only in-person reviews discuss the class, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Both students are very positive and one directly .

The recommendation evidence comes only from in-person students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

There is , so but not proven lenient.

Format shift

evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload appears manageable, but reading and participation are specifically flagged.

Format shift

and participation; there is no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, helpful, and enjoyable to learn from.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention reading and participation but .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and emphasize support, kindness, and engaging teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is that reading and participation may still matter.

What students said

“Mr. Shoemaker is a great instructor.”
GS53
“He doesn't make his students feel dumb and he is always willing to help in any way he can.”
GS53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't make his students feel dumb and he is always willing to help in any way he can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Mr. Shoemaker is a great instructor.”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“He doesn't make his students feel dumb and he is always willing to help in any way he can.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“I enjoyed taking his course and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Shoemaker is a great instructor.
  • makes the time fly when he teaches

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He doesn't make his students feel dumb
  • he is always willing to help in any way he can

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive pattern is clear but thin.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GS532 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values