AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Kim Youngra

ACCOUNTING4A · ACCT4A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take Kim Youngra if you want a forgiving accounting class and are willing to attend and keep up with homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient and caringPass-focusedAttendance-dependentHomework-heavySometimes boring
  • Students describe her as lenient, understanding, and invested in helping students pass.
  • Getting a strong grade appears very realistic if students attend and do the work.
  • The main risk is that attendance and , and lectures may feel boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A looks very reachable because grades reported are high and one student says failing is unlikely unless you do not try.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course seems manageable rather than intellectually hard, but homework and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One student directly says students must attend class to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but one very negative quality rating keeps the recommendation from being a .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report high grades and describe her as very lenient and understanding.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

One review flags lots of homework, so the class is not effortless despite easy grades.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

She is described as caring and passionate, though one review says lectures can be boring and another gives a very low rating.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The but .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but agree the course is manageable if students attend and try.

Main concern

Attendance and .

What students said

“She was very lenient and understanding with her students.”
ACCT4A
“must attend classes if you want to pass”
ACCOUNTING4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Exam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is no way that you should fail unless you're not trying at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and workload themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She was very lenient and understanding with her students.”

📈 Grade Outlook

84/100

“There is no way that you should fail unless you're not trying at all.”

📌

25/100

“must attend classes if you want to pass”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was very lenient and understanding with her students.
  • Her lectures can be a little boring sometimes, but other than that she is a great teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Attendance

  • must attend classes if you want to pass
  • There is no way that you should fail unless you're not trying at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are old with mixed detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCOUNTING4A1 review
ACCT4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values