AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Shawn Fleming

CHEM3A · 3A · CHEM1 · CHEM1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a strong chemistry teacher and are ready to keep up with homework and attendance.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear chemistry explanationsFunny and engagingHeavy homeworkAttendance mattersExam preparation
  • Students strongly praise Fleming's clarity, humor, and ability to make chemistry understandable.
  • The and attendance, so falling behind is the main risk.
  • Grades appear attainable with effort, but not effortless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is attainable, but , and steady effort rather than an easy grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Chemistry is made clearer by the teaching, but the material and pace still require consistent work.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person chemistry classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students say showing up is necessary to pass, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend Fleming because the , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades seem fair and achievable with homework, , and effort, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework and warn that falling behind hurts quickly.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students consistently describe Fleming as , and recommended.

Format shift

Teaching-quality evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams, suggesting a mix with meaningful testing.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and knowledgeable chemistry teacher who makes students work consistently.

Main concern

Homework and , and students can fall behind quickly.

What students said

“Can .”
CHEM1A
“You need to show up if you expect to pass.”
CHEM1A
“Do the .”
3A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention , and , but do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctoring policies.

Exam preparationPop quizzesLab practicalsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lab practicals, but do not clearly prove exact exam format or proctoring rules.

Exam preparationPop quizzesLab practicalsTest heavy
“She helps alot and !”
CHEM3A
“ if you are not the first 5 to finish.”
CHEM1A
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work, but in the end you grasp the concepts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“I just flat out hate chemistry, but she seems to make things very simple to understand...”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“Take a class with .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Do the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable about Chem.
  • Funny as all hell.
  • and helpful teacher!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am very smart but i worked my ass off to get a b.
  • BUt an A is definitely attainable.
  • She really makes you work though.

Theme 3

🧭

  • You need to show up if you expect to pass.
  • Can .
  • Do the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews span many years and mostly agree on teaching quality, but several are old and grade data is limited.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1A4 reviews
3A1 review
CHEM11 review
CHEM3A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values