AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lonnie Godfrey

MATH · MATH101 · MATH103 · MATH102 · TRIG · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you are already comfortable with math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkTough gradingHelpful if tryingNot beginner friendly
  • Students are sharply split, but , and fast explanations.
  • Getting a strong grade usually requires steady work, studying, and .
  • Students who already like math may benefit more .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A appears possible only with real studying and , and there is no to soften the grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math itself may be manageable for strong students, but skipped steps and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person math classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One review directly warns that skipping class means you will not pass, and the teaching style requires being present to follow the work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Most students warn against taking him because the and support is inconsistent.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Reviews mention tough grading, no , and the need to work for the grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report and repeated warnings that the class requires steady work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive comments praise his help and intelligence, but , and incomplete explanations.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews emphasize homework and grades, but .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is limited to in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a polarizing math instructor whose help and intelligence are offset by skipped steps, off-topic lectures, and .

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may get lost because .

What students said

“He will do steps quickly without writing some down and will lose you.”
MATH102
“Most of the class is lost and confussed, needs some work on his teaching skills, because he will jump from concept to concept, with little direction.”
TRIG
“Expect hw each night.”
MATH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or rules.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He skips steps in explaining things and expects you to do HUGE calculations in your head without a calculator”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Expect hw each night.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

32/100

“you might have to work for your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will go completely off topic with stories about his 4th grade teacher.
  • He will do steps quickly without writing some down and will lose you.
  • Teaching style needs a lot of improvemnet!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very tough class.
  • you do haveto work for you grade
  • He does not offer .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • he is always there to help you
  • he will help you out as long as youre trying.
  • he explained things well enough for me to understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews span many years and show consistent concerns about , but several are old and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1012 reviews
2551 review
MATH1 review
MATH1021 review
MATH1031 review
Show 1 more courses
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values