AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Burks

MATH255 · PSY42 · MATH45 · MATH250 · MATH11 · 80419MATH · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take him if , and inconsistent grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnfair grading concernsLots of homeworkExtra credit existsFast lecturesPolarizing support
  • Most negative , and poor availability outside class.
  • Some students , and offers if students participate and ask questions.
  • Success , and being comfortable speaking up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Passing is realistic with homework and attendance, but an A is not easy because , and that may not help enough.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content seems manageable for some students, but , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

16/100

Reviews repeatedly say students need to show up and that skipping class can lead to failing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Negative reviews outnumber positives because students report , and limited help outside class.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

though some and partial credit may exist.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Lots of both positive and negative reviews.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

A few students praise his clarity and care, but many describe fast lectures, condescension, poor availability, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews mention tests, dropped test scores, presentations, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is limited to in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a polarizing math instructor with homework-heavy courses, disputed grading fairness, and .

Main concern

The biggest concern is that as unfair even .

What students said

“He is "lenient" but still grades every one unfairly, he and not to others.”
MATH11
“ ”
MATH250
“Do the homework, and show up, and you'll pass.”
MATH255

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest a test-heavy structure with no lowest-test drop in at least one course, but .

Test heavyNo lowest test dropExtra credit presentations

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not prove open-book, proctoring, or final format.

Test heavyNo lowest test dropExtra credit presentations
“ .”
MATH45
“You can earn by presenting to class on review days.”
PSY42
“he and not to others.”
MATH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is "lenient" but still grades every one unfairly, he and not to others.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

22/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“ finishes Lectures.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Great teacher. Makes sure everyone understands the material before moving on.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • does not help.
  • He is "lenient" but still grades every one unfairly, he and not to others.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • finishes Lectures.
  • Do the homework, and show up, and you'll pass.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes over things way too quickly and is condescending when you ask questions about the material.
  • Great teacher. Makes sure everyone understands the material before moving on.
  • Not available outside of class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent in-person reviews provide detailed and , and recommendation risk.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH452 reviews
80419MATH1 review
MATH111 review
MATH2501 review
MATH2551 review
Show 1 more courses
PSY421 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2