AI Rate Professor

History

Mark Trezza

POLISCI2 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle detailed grading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetail-oriented gradingFair feedbackLecture heavyTough but reasonable
  • The only review describes a fair but .
  • An A is possible, but written work must match expected wording closely.
  • Credibility is limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The reported A suggests success is realistic, but the review says grades require precise detail and careful written work.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course does not sound conceptually extreme, but .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

The because , and is strict without being unreasonable.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and specific words, but the review frames this as fair rather than unfair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review mentions test essays and written assignments but does not describe an unusually heavy workload.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

The review describes him as , and .

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

and written assignments, with no evidence that exams alone dominate.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The essays and written assignments very closely.

Main concern

The main concern is losing points for missing specific phrasing or details.

What students said

“he looked for exact phrases and specific words and if they weren't included in the written work.”
POLISCI2
“He isn't unreasonable, just grades on details.”
POLISCI2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions test essays and detailed grading, but does not clearly .

Test EssaysDetail-Focused Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person evidence only supports test essays graded for exact detail, with .

Test EssaysDetail-Focused Grading
“Mr. Trezza was very detail-oriented in and written assignments.”
POLISCI2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He isn't unreasonable, just grades on details.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting grading precision and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Mr. Trezza is fair and .”

⚖️

32/100

“Often, he looked for exact phrases and specific words and if they weren't included in the written work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“He isn't unreasonable, just grades on details.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Mr. Trezza was very detail-oriented in and written assignments.
  • he looked for exact phrases and specific words and if they weren't included in the written work.
  • He isn't unreasonable, just grades on details.

Theme 2

💬

  • Mr. Trezza is fair and .
  • He isn't unreasonable, just grades on details.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern may not represent the full teaching experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLISCI21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values