AI Rate Professor

Theater

Phillip Gallegos

TA25 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

unless you only care about an easy A and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterMandatory AttendanceWastes Class TimeLecture HeavyTest HeavyEasy A Poor Experience
  • The only reviewer strongly .
  • The class was easy enough to earn an A, but the student found it a waste of time.
  • because class time felt unproductive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The student earned an A while rating difficulty as very low, so the grade seems easy despite the poor experience.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course content sounds basic and slow, centered on small daily vocabulary sets.

Only the in-person review describes the course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

and was criticized as having little value.

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The reviewer directly because it felt like a waste of time.

Recommendation evidence comes entirely from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

The student received an A and rated the difficulty .

Format shift

This .

Workload

Light

78/100

The work sounds light, but .

Format shift

Only the in-person review discusses workload and class structure.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The reviewer says the class wasted time and strongly warns others away.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The tags say test heavy, and the comments .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The but frustrating class with and little perceived learning value.

Main concern

like a waste of time.

What students said

“It was an absolute waste of time.”
TA25
“ .”
TA25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show the class is test heavy but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , but comments do not clearly prove exam rules or format.

Test Heavy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“It was an absolute waste of time.”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ .”

📌

5/100

“The last few months we literally just sat there because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Every day we had 12 vocabulary words and and a half to explain just those 12.
  • It was an absolute waste of time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The last few months we literally just sat there because .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review, though it is detailed and strongly worded.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

TA251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values