AI Rate Professor

Drafting

Ronald Cerkueira

CAD24ADV · CADALL · CADD14 · DRAFT32 · CADD22 · CADD36 · CAD24 · CADD42 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a strong, fair CAD instructor and are willing to attend consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly knowledgeableVery helpfulTough but fairAttendance mattersPop quizzes
  • Students consistently call Cerkueira one of the best and .
  • The class can be tough, but students frame the difficulty as fair and worthwhile.
  • because quizzes and punctuality are repeatedly mentioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades seem achievable with attendance and effort, but students do not describe the course as a free A.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Students say , but several reviews still call the class tough or not easy.

All and drafting courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students mention punctuality, quizzes, and failing when skipping.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and fair.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Reviews describe him as tough but fair, with but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is not described in detail, but and tough class comments suggest steady effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students repeatedly praise his clarity, organization, knowledge, and willingness to help beginners.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention frequent quizzes but also emphasize hands-on CAD learning and class participation.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and helpfulness while noting that attendance and effort matter.

Main concern

because quizzes and punctuality affect success.

What students said

“ and logical.”
CADD36
“ , but are easy.”
CADD42
“Very helpful and easy to understand. Tough but fair.”
CADD14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent easy pop quizzes but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove broader exam rules.

Pop QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ , but are easy.”
CADD42
“ so .”
CADD36

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ron is the best and entire life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ and logical.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ .”

⚖️ Fair Challenge

60/100

“Very helpful and easy to understand. Tough but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is immensely knowledgeable in the field and is generally willing to work with you to a point.
  • Super cool guy...very easy to understand...knows all about CAD which is why i was there
  • Really helpfull, if .

Theme 2

📈

  • Great teacher. BE ON TIME!!
  • , but are easy.
  • The people who failed were the ones who never bothered to show up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across many years are highly consistent about his teaching quality, though some are old and brief.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CADALL2 reviews
CADD142 reviews
CAD241 review
CAD24ADV1 review
CADD221 review
Show 3 more courses
CADD361 review
CADD421 review
DRAFT321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1