AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

J. Frese

CIT15 · CIT4366 · CIT1515432 · 2016SP · CIT66 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

J. Frese is a good pick for students who can tolerate routine lectures and keep up with steady, manageable work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy testsHelpful professorOrganized expectationsBoring lecturesSteady assignments
  • Most students recommend Frese as helpful, fair, and organized.
  • The course is usually easy if students keep up with assignments and study lightly.
  • The main complaint is boring or workload confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very attainable if students keep up with , and study a bit for easy tests.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is often described as basic or easy, especially for students with some computer background, though .

, so the course easiness signal is not split by format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance seems important because reviews mention quizzes, participation points, and needing to come to class, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her for fair structure, help, and and occasional confusion.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Tests are often described as easy and predictable, with , but steady work still matters.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is steady with , and projects, but many students still call it manageable or easy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most reviews praise her as , and fair, while a minority call lectures boring, unclear, or unhelpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and tests, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Assessment evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing , and some boring lectures.

Main concern

Some students find the lectures boring and the .

What students said

“Easy to get an A if you stay up with the work.”
CIT15
“ as long as you study a bit”
CIT15
“Her lectures are too long and .”
CIT15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests predictable and fairly easy tests with practice support, but reviews .

Easy TestsPractice TestsLab Exam ReviewsWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lab exam reviews, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring policies.

Easy TestsPractice TestsLab Exam ReviewsWeekly Quizzes
“All the be.”
CIT15
“There are .”
CIT15
“She does reviews in class for ”
CIT4366

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy to get an A if you stay up with the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She explained things very well.”

📈 Easy A Signal

84/100

“Easy to get an A if you stay up with the work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very personable and helpful.
  • The and easy to follow.
  • Really long drawn out lectures, keeps computers locked during them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you study a bit
  • if you have some background.
  • As long as you kept up with the .

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • Every week there is a quiz and .
  • She gives many opportunities for her students to finish or .
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews across many years provide rich, mostly consistent evidence with a .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIT1518 reviews
CIT663 reviews
2016SP1 review
CIT15154321 review
CIT43661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values