AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stephen Grover

MATH · MATT11 · MATH4A · MATH11STATS · MATH4ATRIG · MATH103 · MATH4B · TRIG101 · TRIG · MATH11 · MATH2010 · STATS11 · STATS · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle a rigid, calculator-heavy math class and are willing to work carefully for your grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMonotone LecturesStrict GradingCalculator-HeavyRetakes AvailablePolarizing
  • Reviews are sharply divided, but many describe him as boring, rigid, and .
  • Some students succeed by doing homework, using the required calculator, and following rules closely.
  • Grading and classroom rules are often described as strict or overly technical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some tests mirror homework and , but students repeatedly say you must work hard and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content may be manageable with homework and calculators, but and rigid methods make the course feel difficult.

, so no format difference can be judged.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Several comments stress never missing class or assignments, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Many students warn against taking him because they .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many students report , and little flexibility around small mistakes.

Format shift

, and the dominant pattern is strictness.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention , and significant outside study time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

A minority praise his organization and clarity, but many describe him as , and unhelpful.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person, with no online reviews to compare.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals, suggesting a mix with meaningful exam weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing instructor whose class rewards discipline but frustrates many students with monotone lectures, strict rules, and .

Main concern

, and rigid classroom expectations.

What students said

“It's simple just pay attention and work hard for your grade.”
MATH11
“ if the whole class doesnt understand.”
MATH11
“horrible teacher. he grades really hard.”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard or strict, but retakes and rather than fully harsh.

Homework-Like TestsRetests AvailableHard ExamsTesting Center Retakes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and testing center retakes, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Homework-Like TestsRetests AvailableHard ExamsTesting Center Retakes
“ and all the .”
MATH11
“ but you are allowed 4 retests.”
MATH11
“you get more time in the testing center when you do so.”
MATH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's simple just pay attention and work hard for your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ if the whole class doesnt understand.”

📈 Effort Required

36/100

“It's simple just pay attention and work hard for your grade.”

⚖️

24/100

“horrible teacher. he grades really hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very monotonous,boring and kinda weird too.
  • . TALKING MONOTONE INSTRUCTOR.
  • and all the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's simple just pay attention and work hard for your grade.
  • horrible teacher. he grades really hard.
  • Tries to give as as possible. Offers no .

Theme 3

🧮 About Rules & Calculator Use

  • You MUST have a TI-83 or TI-84.
  • 95% of math is used on TI-83/84 calculator.
  • If you play by the rules and study hard you will do well.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • !!!!
  • By far the
  • He is extreamly rude when asked to clarify.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide a large, detailed, and consistent picture despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 58
3 out of 58
2 out of 514
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH1123 reviews
MATH4A9 reviews
MATH1036 reviews
1120102 reviews
MATH1 review
Show 9 more courses
MATH11STATS1 review
MATH20101 review
MATH4ATRIG1 review
MATH4B1 review
MATT111 review
STATS1 review
STATS111 review
TRIG1 review
TRIG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1