AI Rate Professor

Marketing

Pamela Hutton

MKTG22FM27 · FM27 · MKTG17FM28 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a caring professor and can keep up with weekly work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational TeacherFair GraderWeekly AssignmentsHands-On ProjectsTextbook Quizzes
  • All reviews rate her highly and describe her as helpful, knowledgeable, caring, and inspirational.
  • Grades appear fair to easy, with and manageable papers, quizzes, and projects.
  • The workload is steady because of weekly assignments and quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

because she grades fairly or easily and offers , but weekly work still requires consistency.

All grade evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students call the class pretty easy, though projects, quizzes, and hands-on work require engagement.

All course and fashion-related classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because the class meets once a week, but reviews do not prove a .

, and they say it matters for staying on track.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and inspirational.

Recommendation and is uniformly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students say she grades fairly or easily and offers , making strong grades realistic with steady effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The class is manageable but , and a final hands-on project.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and they show steady but reasonable work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Every review praises her as helpful, knowledgeable, caring, inspirational, or an amazing teacher.

Format shift

All and is consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment evidence centers on weekly assignments, papers, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and engaging hands-on work.

Main concern

Weekly assignments, quizzes, and .

What students said

“ and well spoken.”
FM27
“Class was pretty easy but since it was 1x a week attending was important.”
MKTG22FM27
“Weekly assignments and .”
MKTG17FM28

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention weekly quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Weekly QuizzesFinal Project

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final project, but exam policy is not clearly proven.

Weekly QuizzesFinal Project
“Make sure to skim the text for the .”
MKTG22FM27
“ make a window display.”
MKTG17FM28

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall I REALLY enjoyed her class, she's very inspirational & you can tell she truly cares!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ and well spoken.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

95/100

“GREAT teacher!”

⚖️

84/100

“she grades all the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and well spoken.
  • she's very inspirational & you can tell she truly cares!
  • Inspirational & challenges you to thrive!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A weekly but she grades easy.
  • Weekly assignments and .
  • make a window display.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • she grades all the .
  • Offers a few E.C assignments.
  • Class was pretty easy but since it was 1x a week attending was important.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FM271 review
MKTG17FM281 review
MKTG22FM271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values