AI Rate Professor

Communication

Nancy Fraleigh

SPEEC2571 · COMM1 · COMMUNICATUION · SPCH1 · SPEEC8 · SPECH1 · SPEECH2 · SPEE1 · SPEECSTAF · SPEEC1 · ENGLISPE1 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are prepared for , and a stressful classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHeavy OutlinesDisorganizedMandatory AttendanceDiscouraging Tone
  • Most students describe the class as hard, demanding, and harshly graded.
  • Repeated complaints focus on disorganization, unclear expectations, favoritism, and discouraging behavior.
  • A few students say effort can pay off, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible for organized students who meet expectations, but most comments , and little sympathy.

All grade evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because students , and meet strict expectations.

All and communication reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as a must because .

, and they describe it as required for points.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because they , and discouraging treatment.

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many reviews call her a hard or and say students must work hard for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report frequent outlines, essays, speeches, and substantial preparation outside class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and most describe it as heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A few students found her effective, but most describe her as .

Format shift

All and is predominantly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and class performance more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

heavy outlines, strict expectations, and many complaints about fairness and organization.

Main concern

, and discouraging interactions are the main concerns.

What students said

“ on some points.”
COMM1
“You need to work hard for your grade; she and will not be sympathetic towards students.”
SPEE1
“She is very disorganized, never lectures, expects students to do most of the work.”
SPEEC8

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on speeches, outlines, and essays, while and .

SpeechesOutlinesEssays

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches, outlines, and essays, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

SpeechesOutlinesEssays
“She requires typed evaluations and outlines.”
COMM1
“She expects you to spend all your free time writing outlines for your speech.”
SPCH1
“You have to do well on the speeches to get a good grade.”
SPEECH2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You need to work hard for your grade; she and will not be sympathetic towards students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She is very disorganized, never lectures, expects students to do most of the work.”

⚖️

18/100

“She takes this class very serious and expects a lot out of her students.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“She expects you to spend all your free time writing outlines for your speech.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrible, has no trust in students at all always feels she is right regardless of the situation and .
  • ! expects students to just know what to do.
  • She was a great teacher!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You definitely need to work hard in this class.
  • You need to work hard for your grade; she and will not be sympathetic towards students.
  • You will definetely get what you deserve.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Do NOT recommender her at ALL!
  • I would not suggest taking her class to anyone- she is discouraging and obnoxious
  • on some points.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years show consistent complaints, though some comments are old and emotionally worded.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SPEEC15 reviews
SPCH12 reviews
279731 review
COMM11 review
COMMUNICATUION1 review
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISPE11 review
SPECH11 review
SPEE11 review
SPEEC25711 review
SPEEC81 review
SPEECH21 review
SPEECSTAF1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1