AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tiffany Friesen

PSY42 · A125 · PSYCH4265202 · MATH4AB · MATH10A · MATHC · ELEMSTATS · MATH10A10B · MATH10AB · MATH42 · MATH201 · MATH11 · TEACHINGMATH · MATH255 · MATH101 · MATH4 · MATH50 · MATH · MATH103 · MATH4B · STATS11 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you are willing to work steadily and ask for help, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient HelperHomework HeavyChallenging ExamsPolarizing Teaching StyleStrong for Motivated Students
  • Many students praise her patience, approachability, and ability to make math clearer.
  • Negative reviews focus , and homework that .
  • , and keep up with homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades seem reachable with steady homework, notes, and help-seeking, but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math content is manageable for some students but often feels fast, abstract, or .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At least one review explicitly says notes are graded and , while others stress attending every class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most positive reviews recommend her for serious students, though several strongly and workload.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and demanding, but not consistently described as unfair across all courses.

Format shift

In-person reviews contain both strong praise and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Several reviews mention lots of , and time-consuming preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students call her patient, helpful, and clear, but a sizable minority describe boring or fast lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Students mention and notes, but and cause most complaints.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a very polarizing math instructor who can be excellent for engaged students but .

Main concern

Several students say homework is heavy and .

What students said

“Attend every class,take notes, complete the if you need help, and you will do well!”
MATH11
“Gives out a lot of Home work that's worth little points, which is also competently different and has nothing to do with exams.”
STATS11
“she breaks down everything step by step until you understand the problem.”
A125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam format appears standard but risky because students often .

Difficult ExamsTheory-Based TestsHomework-Test MismatchReasoning Explanations

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support difficult and sometimes theory-based exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, or proctoring rules.

Difficult ExamsTheory-Based TestsHomework-Test MismatchReasoning Explanations
“ extremely difficult.”
STATS11
“Tets can be kind of hard since .”
MATH4AB
“ or notes.”
MATH4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Attend every class,take notes, complete the if you need help, and you will do well!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“she breaks down everything step by step until you understand the problem.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“The studying for my other classes.”

🧪

42/100

“ extremely difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She uses lots of examples and helps us understand.
  • This , and rarely writes problems on the board.
  • She takes the time to teach you until you get it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is TOUGH and you absolutely must be willing to put in the work to get a good grade.
  • If you do your hw every night, you will pass.
  • !

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Tiffany Friesen is always ready to listen and patiently helps you understand whatever it is you need help on.
  • She will go above and beyond to help her students succeed as long as they are willing to put in the effort.
  • and wants you to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 37 in-person reviews provide a large, detailed, and consistent picture despite polarized opinions.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1015 reviews
MATH2554 reviews
MATH3 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
MATH10A3 reviews
Show 17 more courses
MATH112 reviews
MATH422 reviews
2551 review
A1251 review
ELEMSTATS1 review
MATH10A10B1 review
MATH10AB1 review
MATH2011 review
MATH41 review
MATH4AB1 review
MATH4B1 review
MATH501 review
MATHC1 review
PSY421 review
PSYCH42652021 review
STATS111 review
TEACHINGMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values