AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mark Sutterfield

MATH5A · MATHD · MATHMATH · MATH101 · MATH103 · MATH81 · MATH21 · MATH45 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him for lower-level math if , and a manageable path through the course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear math explanationsVery helpfulEasy tests in lower mathFast pace in harder coursesHomework supports grades
  • Most students praise him as , and especially strong for lower-level math.
  • Tests and grades can be and ask questions.
  • A few reviews warn that upper-level courses may move too fast and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

For many lower-level math classes, students say doing homework and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Lower-level courses are often described as easy and clearly taught, though upper-level material can become fast and confusing.

All course-difficulty evidence is from in-person math classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews suggest attendance and , but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, mainly as .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because , and makes math feel manageable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students mention , credit for , and easy exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

and often online, but students describe it as manageable and directly useful for tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise his clarity and help, though a minority describe him as rude or .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe an approachable math instructor with , and some fast-paced upper-level concerns.

Main concern

Upper-level math students may find his pace too fast and .

What students said

“He shows you how to do the problems in as many ways as possible.”
MATH81
“ ”
MATH45
“Goes way to fast on lectures”
MATH5A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests as easy when students do homework and review the material, but .

Easy TestsReviewed Test QuestionsHomework Supports Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or final exam policies.

Easy TestsReviewed Test QuestionsHomework Supports Exams
“ ”
MATH45
“every single question on the ”
MATH45
“do the homework and the ”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course-level fit; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He is the .”

📈 Easy Grade Path

84/100

“do the homework and the ”

⚠️ Upper-Level Risk

78/100

“Goes way to fast on lectures”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He shows you how to do the problems in as many ways as possible.
  • Lectures were very easy to understand
  • and more than willing to help.

Theme 2

📈

  • when needed.
  • every single question on the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Pace & Fit

  • Goes way to fast on lectures
  • If .
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews give consistent in-person evidence, with and some useful disagreement by course level.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH456 reviews
MATH1011 review
MATH1031 review
MATH211 review
MATH5A1 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH811 review
MATHD1 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values