AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jerry Mouanoutoua

MATH255 · MATH21 · MATH101 · MTH45 · MATH11 · MATH021 · MATH260D25362 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Jerry Mouanoutoua only if you can teach yourself math and mainly want a manageable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandSelf-Teaching RequiredLenient TestsPoor Lecture ClarityNice but Ineffective
  • Grades can be manageable, but many students say the .
  • Fast learners may survive because tests and as heavy.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A appears realistic because tests are easy, homework is limited, and , but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is not always described as hard, but students.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is described as important in one review, but .

, and the evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against taking him because and unhelpful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students mention , and a high A with ordinary studying.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

as limited or reasonable, with the main burden coming from self-teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Several students describe him as hard to understand, unhelpful, and ineffective at explaining math.

Format shift

, and they are mostly negative on teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, passing, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but weak, confusing instruction.

Main concern

Many students say they had to learn from the textbook or by themselves.

What students said

“You won't learn anything unless you teach yourself.”
MATH11
“I had to learned the whole course on my own by myself.”
MTH45
“Easy A in my opinion.”
MATH260D25362

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear student-friendly because reviews mention easy multiple-choice tests, clear study guidance, and .

Easy ExamsMultiple Choice ExamsTest Retake AllowedStudy Guidance Before Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy exams, multiple choice tests, and a , but .

Easy ExamsMultiple Choice ExamsTest Retake Allowed
“The .”
MATH11
“He even allows a if you fail.”
MATH260D25362

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You won't learn anything unless you teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Incomprehensible! Has no control over the class.”

📈 Grade Ease

78/100

“Easy A in my opinion.”

⚠️ Main Risk

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His accent is difficult in the least.
  • Your textbooks will help more than his notes and lectures given.
  • First time ever seeing a teacher .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Tests

  • The .
  • He doesn't give tons of homework and he tells you exactly what to study before the .
  • If you study and do your hw, you will have nothing to worry about.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

and show consistent complaints, but the data is old and grade details are sparse.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH112 reviews
MATH0211 review
MATH1011 review
MATH211 review
MATH2551 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH260D253621 review
MTH451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values