AI Rate Professor

English

Megan Bohigian

ENGLISH125 · ENG125 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her only if you can attend consistently and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teachingHeavy essaysHelpful when engagedAttendance matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between one excellent experience and two very negative ones.
  • The and helpful.
  • and frequent pointless essays.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student earned an A+ , but another says the class piles on a lot of .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material itself is not described as conceptually hard, but and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students say , and one review explicitly suggests attending every class because work is assigned weekly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because two of three reviews describe her as one of the .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are mostly negative despite one strong positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is one A+ report, but there is not .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload appears heavy because a student reports a new essay every week and a lot of useless work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Her teaching is inconsistent, with one strong praise review outweighed and weak instruction.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on essays and weekly work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with one student praising her support and two calling the class poorly taught and work-heavy.

Main concern

and frequent essays.

What students said

“She has a true passion for what she does and is always there to help with any misunderstandings.”
ENGLISH125
“She doesn't elaborate on any work,& she piles a lot of useless work.”
ENG125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't elaborate on any work,& she piles a lot of useless work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Mrs. Bohigian is one of the most influential teachers I have had.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“I would suggest you attend every class because every week she has a ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“One of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a true passion for what she does and is always there to help with any misunderstandings.
  • One of the .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • If yet very helpful.
  • she piles a lot of useless work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because there are only three older reviews, but they , and teaching clarity.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1252 reviews
ENGLISH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values