AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Ron Vivian

HS30 · HS10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTest heavyHeavy readingDisorganized teachingNice but ineffective
  • Most reviews strongly criticize his teaching clarity and organization.
  • they do not make sense even after reading.
  • A few students say success is possible if you read and study hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting a good grade and studying, and several students still found the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because students , and tests that do not match well.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students advise against taking him because lectures and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and the overall tone is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tests appear unforgiving because students say studying and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention , and too much information.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching quality is low because repeated reviews describe , poor focus, and weak classroom control.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

because students mention four tests, exams, and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a nice but often confusing and and studying.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and too much information.

What students said

“his way of .. ”
HS10
“2 papers 4 tests! he gives a crummy study guide”
HS30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and difficult, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Tests and finalStudy guideReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Tests and finalStudy guide
“you'll do find on the exam and final..”
HS30
“2 papers 4 tests! he gives a crummy study guide”
HS30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ test even though you read the book it's too much information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“his way of .. ”

📝

30/100

“2 papers 4 tests! he gives a crummy study guide”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“i would not ever be in his class ever again”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a and doesnt know how to stay on topic!
  • his way of ..

Theme 2

📝

  • reading book and study a must
  • if you read your text book and study, you'll do find on the exam and final..
  • test even though you read the book it's too much information.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because five older reviews show a consistent negative pattern, though one comment is duplicated and dates are old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HS303 reviews
HS102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values