AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Shari Stoops

RN35B · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself pharmacology from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor pharmacology teachingReads from bookLimited guidanceSelf-study requiredUnprepared answers
  • The only review is strongly negative about her pharmacology teaching.
  • The student says lectures are read straight from the book rather than explained.
  • Questions may not be answered well, forcing students to look up material themselves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The , and poor instruction likely makes strong performance depend on self-study.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Pharmacology is made harder because lectures rely on the book and questions may not get useful answers.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence comes only from one in-person nursing review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The student strongly criticizes the teaching because explanations and answers seem weak.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , so leniency cannot be supported beyond a neutral estimate.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one in-person review with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , but the need to look things up yourself increases the practical burden.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The student says she reads from the book and cannot reliably answer drug questions.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe exams, assignments, quizzes, or .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one in-person review with no assessment breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes weak pharmacology instruction with book-reading lectures and little help on drug questions.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Horrible as a pharm teacher.”
RN35B
“She reads lecture straight from the book.”
RN35B
“expect to look it up yourself because she "forgets".”
RN35B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible as a pharm teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and student support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Horrible as a pharm teacher.”

📚 Lecture Style

30/100

“She reads lecture straight from the book.”

🧠 Student Support

25/100

“If you have a question about a drug, expect to look it up yourself because she "forgets".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible as a pharm teacher.
  • She reads lecture straight from the book.

Theme 2

📚

  • She even admits she has never heard of some of the drugs.
  • If you have a question about a drug, expect to look it up yourself because she "forgets".

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the negative signal is specific but not broadly confirmed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RN35B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values