AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Harold Seymour

PSYCH2 · PSY2 · PSYCH16 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can work independently and tolerate very little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude FeedbackNot HelpfulHarsh ToneLow Support
  • Students repeatedly describe him as rude, mean, and unwilling to help.
  • The course content can be easy, but the student experience is strongly negative.
  • Grading and because minor spelling errors receive outsized criticism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One review says the work was not difficult and resulted in an A, but most reviews focus on harsh treatment rather than reliable grade ease.

All , and there are no online reviews in the authoritative count.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material appears manageable, with one review describing only a weekly quiz and another calling it not difficult.

Only in-person-coded evidence exists, though one comment verbally describes taking an online class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and none clearly describe attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students strongly discourage taking him because they describe him as rude and unhelpful.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report criticism over minor spelling errors and little help when they struggle.

Format shift

and feedback.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload seems light in at least one course, but the evidence is limited and mixed with complaints about support.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments describe him as mean, rude, and unwilling to help students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention quizzes and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-coded reviews describe an easy course structure but a very negative instructor attitude.

Main concern

Students say he is rude, mean, and not helpful.

What students said

“ .”
PSYCH16
“This proffesor doesnt help at all.”
PSY2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a weekly quiz and a canceled final paper, but they .

Weekly QuizFinal Paper Canceled

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a canceled final paper but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Weekly QuizFinal Paper Canceled
“There's .”
PSY2
“him having to cancel the .”
PSY2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and is high and mighty because not only does he teach us pathetic students, but is is an awe-inspiring practicing psychologist.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This proffesor doesnt help at all.”

⚠️ Student Treatment

12/100

“He treats people like they're stupid and everyone is wrong.”

📉 Course Warning

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I agree that he's mean and
  • This proffesor doesnt help at all.
  • He treats people like they're stupid and everyone is wrong.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not difficult.
  • I got an A thanks to an error and him having to cancel the .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • He makes mean spirited comments about minor spelling errors
  • He scolds the student for minor spelling errors and doesnt provide extra help if needed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews are consistent about poor support, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY22 reviews
PSYCH161 review
PSYCH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values