AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

A. Preston

CHEM · CHEM3B · CHEM3A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesDisorganized teachingBook-dependent learningKind personalityMixed difficulty
  • The strongest review sharply criticizes his organization, clarity, and test relevance.
  • Other reviews describe him as kind but new or only okay as a teacher.
  • Students may need to rely heavily on the textbook to understand the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The class may not be very hard if students read the book, but .

Evidence comes only from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Students say the class itself is not very hard, but and .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with mixed reports on difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Recommendation is low because the most detailed , and .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with one strongly negative review and two milder reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

No review clearly reports harsh grading, and one student criticizes classmates who expect easy A's.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The class is described as manageable with textbook reading, but lecture confusion can add study time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students repeatedly mention unclear or inexperienced teaching, despite noting that .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The most detailed review focuses on practice tests and tests, with little assignment evidence.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean negative on teaching clarity and organization.

Main concern

, so students may need to rely on the textbook.

What students said

“ and does not know how to balance a simple equation himself.”
CHEM3A
“He is a , but the book makes up for that.”
CHEM3B
“ ...very new at teaching”
CHEM

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are mentioned as frustrating and sometimes random, but reviews do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring policy.

Tests mentionedPractice tests not very helpfulExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Tests mentionedPractice tests not very helpful
“even the because he puts in some random questions.”
CHEM3A
“The ”
CHEM3A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a , but the book makes up for that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and tests. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and does not know how to balance a simple equation himself.”

📘

52/100

“He is a , but the book makes up for that.”

⚖️ Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an absolutely horrible teacher.
  • and does not know how to balance a simple equation himself.
  • ...very new at teaching
  • He was okay.

Theme 2

📈

  • The class is not very hard if you read the book and understand it.
  • even the because he puts in some random questions.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but specific evidence, with one very detailed negative account.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1 review
CHEM3A1 review
CHEM3B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values