AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Tech.

Jennifer Kish

CIT15 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and steady weekly work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful With AssignmentsUnclear InstructionsWeekly DeadlinesLimited Lab Time
  • Student experiences are split between helpful support and .
  • and many presentations.
  • Evidence is limited to two old in-person CIT15 reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A likely requires steady effort because comments mention weekly due dates, presentations, and .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content itself is not described as conceptually hard, but .

Only in-person comments discuss course difficulty, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on whether a student values assignment and weekly workload.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No grades or grading-policy comments are provided, so .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

One review describes weekly due dates and many presentations, making the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students describe her as helpful, but also .

Format shift

All teaching-quality evidence is from in-person CIT15 reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention assignments and presentations but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with one student praising assignment help and , and workload.

Main concern

and frequent deadlines.

What students said

“ .”
CIT15
“ ”
CIT15
“There is something due every week and a lot of presentations.”
CIT15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, final format, or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not explain the work she assigns thoroughly, there is rarely lab time ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“There is something due every week and a lot of presentations.”

⚠️ Clarity Concern

45/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is something due every week and a lot of presentations.
  • there is

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2012 are available, and they provide limited detail with mixed opinions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIT152 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values