AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Jean Kennedy

WKEXP19 · PSYCHL01 · WSTS10 · WOSTS10 · WOMENSSTUDIES · COUNC53 · WHIS10 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want structured teaching, but self-directed students may still pass through completion work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedOften lateConfusing lecturesLenient completion gradingLittle learning
  • Students consistently describe her as , and .
  • The class may not be hard to pass because grading often appears based on completion or .
  • Most reviews say students learned little and had to rely on the book or their own judgment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Passing or earning an A can be possible through completion work and , but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The subject itself is not described as intellectually hard, but confusion and disorganization make the course harder than it should be.

Only in-person reviews discuss course ease and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but students describe late starts and class time filled with off-topic lectures.

In-person reviews mention attendance-related classroom issues, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they found the class disorganized, confusing, and low-value.

The recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several reviews say grading is based on doing work, estimating standing, portfolios, or rather than strict quality standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as intense, but late bulk deadlines, portfolios, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload and deadlines.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Reviews , and ineffective at teaching.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear centered on work completion, portfolios, , and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a , and little useful teaching.

Main concern

The major concern is poor organization and .

What students said

“ , and .”
WOSTS10
“Doesn't keep track of grades expects you to know where you stand.”
WHIS10
“all and all I havent learned a single thing”
COUNC53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final and , but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Final MentionedPortfolio MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and portfolio, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or strictly proctored.

Final MentionedPortfolio MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy
“She makes you estimate the grade you got in the class to determine if .”
WSTS10
“Wants portfolio at end of semester so she can see what grade to give you.”
WHIS10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worst professor I've had so far. , and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting organization, teaching quality, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“The way .”

⚖️

70/100

“She grades on whether you do your work or not and and not based on the quality of it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The way .
  • lectures about nothing.
  • im done with the class and !!

Theme 2

🗂️ About Organization

  • , and .
  • Arrived and get started
  • She was constantly late, scattered about her subject.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • I got an A in the class, but she was one of the .
  • She does offer tons of though which helps.
  • Doesn't keep track of grades expects you to know where you stand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

and highly consistent about disorganization and poor teaching.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

WSTS103 reviews
COUNC531 review
PSYCHL011 review
WHIS101 review
WKEXP191 review
Show 2 more courses
WOMENSSTUDIES1 review
WOSTS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values