AI Rate Professor

Library Science

David Racki

LIB1 · LAW101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a highly supportive, approachable instructor who helps students understand the material.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtremely HelpfulCaring TeacherKnowledgeableAccessible Outside ClassBeginner Friendly
  • Students describe him as unusually helpful, caring, and willing to listen.
  • He is seen as knowledgeable and open about sharing what he knows.
  • Students report strong support that helps them understand material and earn B's or A's.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A student says his help leads to B's or A's, but the reviews do not prove an effortless A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course experience seems manageable because he makes sure students understand the material and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they emphasize support rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and available outside class.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

There is , but one student links his support to earning B's or A's.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The reviews do not mention a heavy workload, but they also do not describe the class as low effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload details are limited.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as caring, helpful, knowledgeable, attentive, and effective at helping them understand material.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

No format has clear assessment-method evidence beyond general course support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and consistently helpful.

Main concern

The small number of reviews limits certainty, but the comments are strongly positive.

What students said

“he actually listens and cares.”
LIB1
“ ”
LAW101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He really cares about me and makes sure I understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He really cares about me and makes sure I understand the material.”

❤️ Student Support

96/100

“You can ask him anything and everything and he actually listens and cares.”

📈 Grade Support

78/100

“thanks to him, I always get B's or A's in my other classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He really cares about me and makes sure I understand the material.

Theme 2

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • You can ask him anything and everything and he actually listens and cares.

Theme 3

🧠 About Knowledge

  • You will be amazed at how much he knows and is totally open about sharing it with you.
  • Mr. Racki is the most helpful and interesting librarian I have met.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two old reviews, even though both are detailed and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LAW1011 review
LIB11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values