AI Rate Professor

English

Lily Small

ENGLI126 · ENG126 · ENGL100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and learn independently despite a friendly classroom tone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice PersonalityDisorganizedConfusing TeachingLenient GradingHeavy Work Bursts
  • Students consistently describe Lily Small as nice, but teaching quality is highly inconsistent.
  • Several reviews mention disorganization, unclear expectations, and .
  • Leniency helps somewhat, but workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Lenient grading helps, but unclear expectations and effortless.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material may not be inherently hard, but and memory-heavy work make the course feel harder.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Most comments hesitate or warn against taking her because the course feels disorganized and unclear.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

One review directly calls her lenient, but the lack of a .

Format shift

, and they show leniency mixed with .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students mention too much work at one time and memory-heavy demands.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and the comments lean heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her kindness is noted, but multiple students say .

Format shift

, and they are mostly negative on teaching clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and memory demands without a single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

review but several warning about disorganization and poor teaching clarity.

Main concern

Students may struggle because assignments, tests, and .

What students said

“ and unorganized”
ENGLI126
“there is ”
ENG126
“Too much work at one time.”
ENG126

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Test Material Feels DifferentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from class coverage, but exam policy is not clearly proven.

Test Material Feels DifferentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ over in a way.”
ENGLI126

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is a nice person and lenient but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She is a nice person, but can not teach at all.”

⚖️

68/100

“she is a nice person and lenient but .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“ . any other teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Dr. Small is the most wonderful professor ever.
  • She is a nice person, but can not teach at all.

Theme 2

📚 About Organization

  • and unorganized
  • the entire syllabus can be thrown out the window.
  • dr. .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • there is .
  • Too much work at one time.
  • You would need a lot of good memory just to get through this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four older reviews show consistent concerns but limited modern evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1262 reviews
ENGL1001 review
ENGLI1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values