AI Rate Professor

Languages

Patrick McIlhargey

LING11 · ESL3823 · ESL2145 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and studying the material pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair DifficultyWork RequiredShort Answer ExamsGood TeacherMaterial Knowledge Needed
  • Students view McIlhargey as a good teacher with manageable but real expectations.
  • Passing or earning a strong grade depends on doing the work and knowing the material.
  • There is no online evidence, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A strong grade is possible if students do the work, but .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is described as neither too easy nor too difficult, with .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are no online reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students call him a good teacher and suggest success is fair if you do the work.

Recommendation and is positive but based on few comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and material knowledge matter, not an automatic easy A.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and but consistent.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload appears moderate because students must do the work and study, but no heavy workload is described.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students describe him as a good teacher, though the small review set gives limited teaching-style detail.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment evidence is short-answer exams that require knowing the material.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

exams require actual knowledge rather than guessing.

Main concern

Short-answer exams mean students must know the material to pass.

What students said

“do your work and you will pass.”
ESL2145
“not too easy or too difficult.”
LING11
“must know the material to pass the tests.”
LING11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews identify short-answer exams that require material knowledge, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Short Answer ExamsMaterial Knowledge RequiredExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and require knowing the material, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Short Answer ExamsMaterial Knowledge Required
“ answer questions”
LING11
“must know the material to pass the tests.”
LING11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good teacher, not too easy or too difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“great teacher.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“do your work and you will pass.”

📝

48/100

“ answer questions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great teacher.
  • Good teacher, not too easy or too difficult.

Theme 2

📚

  • do your work and you will pass.
  • answer questions
  • must know the material to pass the tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews are available, one has no comment, and all reviews are old, so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL21451 review
ESL38231 review
LING111 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values