Grant Hyde

ENGLISH1A3 · ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · ENG126 · ENG3 · ENGLISH · ENGL126 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 81/100
RMP rating: 3.9/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you can handle some disorganization and want an engaging English class with chances to improve your writing grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWitty and funnyCreative class activitiesInconsistent scheduleRewrite-friendly gradingSometimes harsh

Most positive reviews praise his humor, intelligence, and unusual teaching style.
Grades can be demanding at first, but rewrites and .
The main risk is , and vague paper expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic because rewrites and , but , and occasional harshness still require effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The readings and concepts are usually manageable, but English 1A and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person English classes.

Is attendance flexible?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him for humor, intelligence, and engaging teaching, while a few strongly warn about inconsistency and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He can grade hard, but rewrites and comments about easier grading make the .

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload includes essays and sometimes a research paper, but several students found the class manageable or easier in ENG3.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often call him witty, intelligent, and engaging, but some say he is vague, inconsistent, or absent too often.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and a research paper rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a funny, intelligent teacher who can be engaging but inconsistent with , and .

Main concern

and changing due dates can make the class unpredictable.

What students said

“He will let you rewrite a .”
ENG1A

“ and due dates were always changing.”
ENG126

“if you don't show up, you won't know what's due the next day.”
ENG3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and rewrites, and they do not .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a research paper, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

PapersRewritesResearch Paper

“he did require a research paper.”
ENG3

“He will let you rewrite a .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“He will let you rewrite a .”
Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He's intelligent, witty as some have mentioned, and gosh pretty laid back as hell, in terms of his demeanor.”

⚖️

72/100

“If you understand the readings and concepts, you'll probably do very well because he is one of the more easier graders.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“ and due dates were always changing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He incorporates movies, games, television shows, and .
Instructor was thought-provoking and intelligent without being pompous or pretentious.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

He grades hard but .
Concepts weren't hard to grasp but I didn't think he explained them well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

he only showed up for class about 50% of the time.
I don't think he has a set schedule for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 12 detailed but old reviews with mixed yet recurring themes.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58

4 out of 50

3 out of 52

2 out of 50

1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A3 reviews

ENG33 reviews

ENG1262 reviews

ENGL1261 review

ENGLISH1 review

Show 2 more courses

ENGLISH1A1 review

ENGLISH1A31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Grant Hyde

x x if you can handle some disorganization and want an engaging English class with chances to improve your writing grade.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Recommended

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

⚠️ Organization Risk

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Consistency

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can handle some disorganization and want an engaging English class with chances to improve your writing grade.

⚖️