AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Daggs

MATH255 · MATH103 · MATH260 · MATH11 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Consider him for courses , but be cautious in statistics because reviews are sharply negative.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful one-on-oneExtra creditFair testsInconsistent teachingGrading complaints
  • Positive reviews describe a helpful math instructor who explains multiple methods and offers .
  • Negative reviews , and severe outcomes in statistics.
  • The experience appears highly course-dependent, with stronger reviews in MATH255 and weaker reviews in MATH11.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, and partial credit help, but negative grading reports keep the A path uncertain.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math content is not described as easy, but .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and fairness or strongly criticize his teaching and grading.

The split recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Partial credit and suggest fairness, but multiple reviews accuse him of bad or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and tests are mentioned, but there is not enough evidence of an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students praise his explanations and one-on-one help, while others say he is distracted or does not know the material.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, tests, partial credit, and , suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews and severe complaints about grading and teaching quality.

Main concern

Teaching and .

What students said

“Tests fair. Gives partial credit for attempted work even if answer wrong.”
MATH255
“He doesn't even know what he is teaching and .”
MATH11
“He was not fair with ..”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention fair tests, partial credit, and easy quizzes, but .

Fair TestsPartial CreditEasy Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and easy quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam security or book policy.

Fair TestsPartial CreditEasy Quizzes
“Tests fair.”
MATH255
“Gives partial credit for attempted work even if answer wrong.”
MATH255
“ .”
MATH255

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher! . Shows many ways to work problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ . Shows many ways to work problems.”

⚖️

52/100

“Gives partial credit for attempted work even if answer wrong.”

⚠️ Course Risk

35/100

“He doesn't even know what he is teaching and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches lesson then walks around giving one on one assistance.
  • ! Takes time to show you.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Gives and .
  • He was not fair with ..

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • Made improvements to his teaching style from having him in 101 to 103.
  • Almost half of the class got F and most of them dropped out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 7 old reviews give detailed but strongly divided evidence across different math courses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1032 reviews
MATH112 reviews
MATH2552 reviews
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values