AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Hassan Setoodeh

ACCTGSUM · ACCTG53 · ACTNG4B · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are a serious accounting student and occasional clarity issues.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableCaringChallenging testsFair gradingAccent concern
  • Most students praise his knowledge, care, and informative accounting instruction.
  • Tests are described as challenging, though .
  • One strongly negative review reports unclear lectures, hard-to-understand accent, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A likely requires serious study because though as fair.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Accounting content is informative but not easy, and and serious study.

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One and punctuality, suggesting attendance matters even if .

, and no online attendance evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and care, but one review strongly warns about clarity problems.

and mixed but mostly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students explicitly call grading fair, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not describe heavy homework, but .

Format shift

evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students call him knowledgeable and caring, but one student reports serious clarity and accent issues.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only and contains both strong praise and one major complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews focus mainly on tests and do not describe assignments as the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive for serious students, but one review raises major clarity and accent concerns.

Main concern

and one student says lecture and .

What students said

“The , but the .”
ACCTGSUM
“He has a thick accent that is hard to understand and doesnt remember all the material hes trying to teach.”
ACCTG53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exams appear challenging but not harsh overall, with .

Challenging TestsFair GradingOpen Book Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one open-book test format, but do not prove proctoring details.

Challenging TestsFair GradingOpen Book Tests
“The , but the .”
ACCTGSUM
“He lets , but the questions he uses dont have anything to do with the lecture.”
ACCTG53

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The , but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Very knowledgeable and caring instructor.”

🧪

62/100

“The , but the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Quality instructor; he's very knowledgeable and considerate.
  • Very knowledgeable and caring instructor.
  • The instructor is very kowledgeable and caring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The , but the .
  • and punctuality.
  • He lets , but the questions he uses dont have anything to do with the lecture.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • OMG!! I hate this guy.
  • He has a thick accent that is hard to understand and doesnt remember all the material hes trying to teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and give useful detail, but the sample is small and somewhat dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTGSUM2 reviews
ACCTG531 review
ACTNG4B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values