AI Rate Professor

English

James Saddler

HUM10 · HUMANITIES10 · ENG1A · ENG1 · HUMAN1 · ENG42 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL42 · HUMANATIES10 · ENGLISH · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if and want a low-effort grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesEasy gradingMonotone deliveryUnclear assignmentsKnowledgeable but inconsistent
  • Students repeatedly say his teaching and .
  • Grades appear easy because work and tests are lenient.
  • A few students found him intelligent and interesting, but most warn against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A seems easy if students turn in work or study guides, even when the class feels confusing.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The workload and tests are described as easy, but material itself.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance sounds difficult to maintain and not always valuable, but .

Only in-person reviews mention attendance, with several students saying class was hard to attend.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students do not recommend him because and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly say the work, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

The course appears light because students mention easy work, simple tests, and low pressure.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often call him confusing, boring, monotone, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but frequent confusion, boredom, and .

Main concern

Students often could not understand lectures or assignments.

What students said

“ ”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG1A
“not a though. work is easy”
ENG42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The study guides are completed and usable.

Easy TestsStudy Guides AllowedBook Needed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Easy TestsStudy Guides Allowed
“ so long as you fill in your study guides (you can use them on the test).”
HUM10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great guy, awful teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Great guy, awful teacher.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

86/100

“it's not difficult to get an A”

⚠️ Main Risk

32/100

“If you want to !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This guy lacks so much clarity it's rediculous.
  • typical monotone professor. u will fall asleep.
  • Fascinating and highly intelligent instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not a though. work is easy.
  • i didnt go 2 class and still have an A.
  • It is an easy course, but unfortunetly it is also extreemly boring.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Frustration

  • No one in my class ever knew what we were suppose to be doing.
  • I was forced to withdraw from this class due to a lack of clarity.
  • ... EVEN IF YOU NEED IT!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

There are 16 detailed in-person reviews across several years with a consistent pattern of and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A4 reviews
ENG422 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG11 review
Show 5 more courses
ENGL421 review
HUM101 review
HUMAN11 review
HUMANATIES101 review
HUMANITIES101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values