AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zwi Reznik

MATH5A · MATH5 · MATH260B · MATH260D · CALCULUS · MATH6 · CALCXXXX · MATH260 · MATH7 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you want a tough, concept-heavy math class and can handle a blunt, polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConcept-heavy testsRude toneHard grading feelKnowledgeable but polarizing
  • Students repeatedly describe him as knowledgeable, but .
  • The class is usually demanding, with , and an expectation that students work hard.
  • Several negative reviews focus on rudeness, ego, and feeling humiliated rather than supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Getting an A appears possible only with real effort, office-hour help, and tolerance for .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students often describe the math content and exams as .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

A minority recommend him for learning math, but because of harsh interactions and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students , and needing to work for the grade, with little evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Homework and test preparation are described as substantial, especially for students who struggle with the concepts.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is often called knowledgeable, but many students .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, with tests and quizzes carrying noticeable weight.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and polarizing math instructor who can teach serious students but often frustrates others with tone and clarity.

Main concern

Many students report rude behavior, , and .

What students said

“Expect to work for your grade.”
MATH6
“Prof. was extremely rude and unhelpful.”
MATH6
“He can't teach, period.”
CALCULUS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as concept-heavy and unclear, but reviews .

Concept-Focused TestsUnclear QuizzesWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Concept-Focused TestsUnclear QuizzesWeekly Quizzes
“ ”
MATH7
“His tests and , but .”
MATH6
“ ”
MATH7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your grade and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and student treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Knows his mathematics but his teaching methods are lacking, if you ask me.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

31/100

“Expect to work for your grade.”

⚠️ Student Experience

34/100

“Prof. was extremely rude and unhelpful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was very knowledgeable professor that was good at communicating the material.
  • and follow his lectures.
  • but as far as explaining it one on one.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Expect to work for your grade.
  • His tests and , but .
  • The is good.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Tone

  • What makes him so bad is that he enjoys insulting & humiliating others.
  • Prof. was extremely rude and unhelpful.
  • The class was not very hard, but dealing with him was just terrrible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

83/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 20 in-person reviews across several years with consistent themes about difficulty, teaching clarity, and personality.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH67 reviews
MATH73 reviews
CALCULUS2 reviews
MATH2602 reviews
MATH5A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
CALCXXXX1 review
MATH260B1 review
MATH260D1 review
MATH51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values