AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Gina Wallace

PLSCI2 · POLSC2 · PLCPLC · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid her unless , and learning much of the material independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInteresting but off topicBiased grading concernsHard testsPoor test alignment
  • Reviews are sharply split, with some students finding her interesting and factual while others call her biased and unhelpful.
  • The biggest academic issue is that as poorly aligned with lectures and lacking study guides.
  • Students report difficult grading and some engaging lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Grades appear difficult because tests are poorly supported, class averages are reported low, and students expect mostly B or C outcomes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject can be interesting, but and off-topic lectures make the class harder than the content alone suggests.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but lecture-test mismatch makes attending alone unreliable for success.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most reviews advise against taking her because of bias concerns, weak support, and tests that do not match class material.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students report , and a class average around 62 percent.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews focus more on test quality and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students find her interesting and knowledgeable, but more reviews cite bias, off-topic lectures, and poor help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Student complaints center on tests, missing study guides, and lectures that .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe an interesting but inconsistent political science class with , and support.

Main concern

Students most often complain that and that .

What students said

“She was very straight forward and truthful, not biased.”
POLSC2
“Very biased, teaches facts as opinion.”
POLSC2
“The only problem with this class is the ”
PLSCI2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard, unsupported by study guides, and poorly aligned with lectures, with .

No Study GuidesPoor Lecture-Test AlignmentHard Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test questions not matching lectures, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

No Study GuidesPoor Lecture-Test AlignmentHard Tests
“ .”
POLSC2
“She what is on the test.”
POLSC2
“the ”
PLSCI2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The only problem with this class is the cause class is spent telling stories.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Lectures often off topic.”

⚖️

24/100

“ .”

📝

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knew the subject extremely well by having experience outside of the class.
  • Lectures often off topic.
  • she made the class extremely interesting

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • .
  • She what is on the test.
  • The only problem with this class is the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness And Support

  • Very biased, teaches facts as opinion.
  • .
  • she responded back and never answered my question.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on only 6 older in-person reviews, but they provide specific and , and bias.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLSC24 reviews
PLCPLC1 review
PLSCI21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values