AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julie Clark

MATH255 · MATH6538 · MMATH · MATH101 · MATH4B · MATH103 · MATH42 · MATH277 · MATH11 · MATH260 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a potentially easy math grade and can tolerate an uneven teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherEasy gradingHelpful for someConfusing for othersAttendance matters
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with many students loving her help and .
  • Grades can be easy because of , and .
  • Attendance and , and some students say questions frustrate her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students report easy grades , and finals based on previous tests, but homework and attendance still matter.

All analyzed reviews are counted as in person, so there is no separate online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The material often seems manageable, but several students .

Course easiness .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and several comments tie success to showing up and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but strong negative reviews make her a risky fit.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students , and retakes for half credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and sometimes heavy in short sessions, but many students still describe the class as easy.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Some students call her helpful and patient, while , and frustrated by questions.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals based on prior tests, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive, with and helpfulness .

Main concern

Teaching quality varies widely by student experience, especially when students ask questions or .

What students said

“For an easy A with .”
MATH11
“ ”
MATH42
“ 1/2 credit.”
MATH255

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests fair and forgiving tests, but reviews .

Study Guides Match TestsRetake For Half CreditFinal Uses Previous TestsStraightforward Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe straightforward , and finals using previous test questions.

Study Guides Match TestsRetake For Half CreditFinal Uses Previous TestsStraightforward Tests
“You wont be surprised if you know the study guides!”
MATH42
“ 1/2 credit.”
MATH255
“the so remember them.”
MATH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For an easy A with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ . Cured my math anxiety.”

📈 Grade Friendliness

82/100

“For an easy A with .”

⚠️ Main Risk

38/100

“the and confusing. hope you like to teach yourself!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She wants you to pass so ask questions.
  • and has patience.
  • the and confusing. hope you like to teach yourself!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives as well!
  • For an easy A with .
  • so bad.
  • and you .

Theme 3

🧭 About Classroom Fit

  • so plan on being there 90% of the time
  • She tends to take to much time on problems in class.
  • she gets really flustered by noise and a lot of questions
  • I def. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 25 reviews across several years with detailed and consistent themes, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH426 reviews
MATH2554 reviews
MATH113 reviews
MATH4B3 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH2602 reviews
MATH2772 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH65381 review
MMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values