AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Jennifer Hohri

ESL67 · ENG67 · ESL265 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a caring ESL teacher and are ready to keep up with , and attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring teacherHeavy homeworkStrict essaysAttendance pressureESL supportive
  • Students mostly describe her as friendly, supportive, and .
  • One detailed review reports a lot of homework, essays, in-class work, and .
  • The course can reward steady effort, but it is not a low-effort easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A , and attendance rather than minimal effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students call her friendly and easy, but the and English 1A-like expectations keep the course from being effortless.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One detailed review says and limits missed work, while other reviews do not contradict it.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because she is helpful and caring, though workload and .

All and ENG reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and a , while other reviews describe her more positively.

Format shift

and is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The most detailed workload review reports a lot of homework, in-class work, and essays.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students emphasize that she is friendly, helpful, and and workload experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize homework, in-class work, and essays rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her support and friendliness, but one student reports , and .

Main concern

The main risk is that homework, essays, and difficulty average suggests.

What students said

“She was always there when I needed help.”
ENG67
“theres A LOT of and essays.”
ESL67
“ .”
ESL265

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and assessment comments focus more on essays and homework.

No Clear Exam EvidenceEssaysHomework

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and in-class work, but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

EssaysHomeworkIn-Class WorkNo Clear Exam Policy
“theres A LOT of and essays.”
ESL67
“Just do the .”
ESL265

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was always there when I needed help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting support, workload, and ; credibility rating: Low.

Teaching Support

78/100

“She was always there when I needed help.”

Workload Pressure

30/100

“theres A LOT of and essays.”

Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

Teaching Support

  • This teacher is the .
  • She was always there when I needed help.
  • Shes a really friendly and easy professor.

Theme 2

Workload And Grades

  • theres A LOT of and essays.
  • she grades pretty hard on all the essay
  • a 'b'.

Theme 3

Attendance And Fit

  • she is hard on attendence
  • Just do the .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

, and they contain one strong workload complaint against two positive experiences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG671 review
ESL2651 review
ESL671 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values