AI Rate Professor

Biology

Daniel Dougherty

BIO20 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle disorganization and prepare broadly for unpredictable tests.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHighly unorganizedConfusing testsUnpredictable examsModerate difficultyWeak structure
  • The review describes the professor as and slow to start class.
  • and inconsistent, forcing students to study everything.
  • The course is not the hardest option, but the teaching style creates unnecessary confusion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A likely requires broad studying because students do not know .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course is not described as extremely hard, but and testing make it harder than it should be.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The review is negative because disorganization and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The review says he is not as hard as other teachers, but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload pressure comes from needing to study everything for .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Teaching is described as highly unorganized and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The review focuses almost entirely on tests and testing style, with .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person class is moderately difficult but confusing because lectures and .

Main concern

The main concern is unpredictable testing and disorganized class flow.

What students said

“ .”
BIO20
“His .”
BIO20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as confusing and inconsistent, but reviews do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Confusing TestsInconsistent Test StyleUnpredictable Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and inconsistent, with students expected to study everything.

Confusing TestsInconsistent Test StyleUnpredictable Coverage
“His .”
BIO20
“He does not stick to one style.”
BIO20
“You'd never know just what he'll put on the test, so you'll basically have to study everything.”
BIO20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'd never know just what he'll put on the test, so you'll basically have to study everything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ .”

📝

30/100

“His .”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

35/100

“He's not as hard as the other teachers but he can really confuse you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • It takes him 5-10 minutes to get ready to start the class.
  • He's not as hard as the other teachers but he can really confuse you.

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • His .
  • He does not stick to one style.
  • You'd never know just what he'll put on the test, so you'll basically have to study everything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, though it gives specific examples of disorganization and testing issues.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values