AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Kerry McCutcheon

PHIL2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy class with steady work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesCaringLenient GradingParticipation MattersClear Criteria
  • Students unanimously praise Kerry McCutcheon as caring, engaging, and respectful.
  • The class has , and writing assignments, but .
  • because quizzes happen in class and assignments are easier when students show up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Getting an A appears very easy if students attend and complete routine work because and lowest scores are dropped.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students call the quizzes and assignments easy, while lectures are interesting and accessible.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not described as strictly punitive, but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students unanimously recommend her because , and clear.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

, and dropped lowest scores make grading highly generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The work is easy but steady, with , and several writing assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Students consistently describe her lectures as , and inviting.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses weekly quizzes, discussion boards, exams, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are consistently excellent and , and lenient grading.

Main concern

Students should expect weekly participation and .

What students said

“Her lectures are interesting and eye opening!”
phil-2
“Gives a no matter how many you get wrong”
phil-2
“she is very linnet and , and quizzes.”
phil-2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention four exams and dropped lowest scores, but .

Four ExamsDropped Lowest Exam ScoreEasy Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and dropped scores but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Four ExamsDropped Lowest Exam ScoreEasy Quizzes
“4 exams, 4 or 5 writing assignments using premise and conclusion format.”
phil-2
“she is very linnet and , and quizzes.”
phil-2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor McCutcheon is amazing! Her lectures are interesting and inviting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

99/100

“Her lectures are interesting and eye opening!”

96/100

“Gives a no matter how many you get wrong”

Recommendation Rate

99/100

“ .”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Professor McCutcheon is amazing! Her lectures are interesting and eye opening!
  • She ensures everyone feels respected in class while teaching.

Theme 2

Grades And Assignments

  • , and if you show up to class.
  • she is very linnet and , and quizzes.

Theme 3

Class Structure

  • .
  • 4 exams, 4 or 5 writing assignments using premise and conclusion format.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The reviews are recent, consistent, detailed, and unanimous despite a small sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

phil-24 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values