AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jeffery Epstein

PHIL121 · PHIL113 · PHIL111 · PHIL122 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
56.9%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if and can tolerate harsh, highly specific grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyNitpicky FeedbackThought ProvokingRetakes Allowed
  • Passionate lectures and interesting philosophy content draw strong praise.
  • and and papers.
  • Students who mirror his phrasing and ; others feel crushed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Full marks are rare; students say even unless phrasing matches his expectations.

Online reviews emphasize near-impossible perfect scores; in-person still hard but more students report A outcomes with effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and exacting writing make the course intellectually demanding.

and analysis hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

64/100

as not mandatory, though participation on boards still matters heavily.

Online attendance is often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Take-again near 57% with a split between life-changing lecture fans and .

In-person recommendation skews warmer on teaching; online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; students report 6.5-8/10 averages and deductions for tiny omissions.

Format shift

Harshness is loudest online; .

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and papers create a heavy load for a gen-ed philosophy class.

Format shift

Online weekly posts and multi-hour lectures drive most workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

, and inspiring, even while hating the .

Format shift

; online video lectures are thorough but less magical for some.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and papers rather than a single assessment type.

Format shift

Online is discussion and quiz heavy; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person, students more often praise exciting lectures and growth, while and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“The most entertaining class I have ever taken. His lectures are AMAZING”
PHIL113
“ .”
PHIL121
“Dr. Epstein is the reason I went into philosophy.”
PHIL122

Remote format

Online

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lecture heavy with precise regurgitation expected and frequent frustration over impossible-seeming scores.

Main concern

Harsh, unclear discussion and .

What students said

“ ed class.”
PHIL113
“Do not expand on the text; regurgitate what's there exactly.”
PHIL121
“He grades work promptly and . The and organized”
PHIL122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

precise written work, quizzes, and .

Discussion HeavyWeekly QuizzesPapersOpen Book Essay PortionsRetakes Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and advance prompts, still graded strictly.

Open Book TestsEssay PortionsAdvance Prompts
“ advance so PREP.”
PHIL113
“You can have the correct answer and write tons for the discussion and you will get a 8 out of 10”
PHIL121

Online

Online grading focuses on discussions, quizzes, and papers with exact terminology required; .

Weekly DiscussionsQuizzesPapersRetakes Allowed
“ and usually a the week.”
PHIL121
“he allows for if you are disappointed with your grade”
PHIL113
“average score on final essay was a 65”
PHIL113

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ed class. No matter how detailed your lecture/reading notes are, he will find something wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, contrasting inspiring lectures with . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

18/100

“ if you don't do exactly down to the wording what he wants.”

🎓 Lecture Quality

78/100

“His lectures are AMAZING, exciting, and you can tell he is passionate about the subjects discussed in class.”

📚 Course Rigor

30/100

“this was one of the hardest classes I have taken besides my science classes.”

👍 Recommendation Split

56/100

“Absolutely consider taking this professor. The but once you get into it the class is a blast”

Theme 1

🧠 About Teaching & Content

  • Really interesting class
  • lectures were thorough, easy to follow
  • Dr. Epstein is the reason I went into philosophy

Theme 2

📉

  • never received over an 80% on ANYTHING
  • He is always asking for more without specifying what
  • Don't learn ethics from Jeffery Epstein

Theme 3

✍️ About How To Survive

  • regurgitate what's there exactly
  • as long as you are precise when writing and do the , you'll do fine
  • he allows for if you are disappointed with your grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over multiple years with and strong-lecture themes support high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 512
3 out of 59
2 out of 57
1 out of 512

Course coverage

PHIL12119 reviews
PHIL11318 reviews
PHIL1228 reviews
PHIL1115 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 6 · A 11 · A- 4

B range

13

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 3

C range

6

C+ 4 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2