AI Rate Professor

Art

Lily Glass

ART220 · ARTI210 · ART200 · ARTD150 · ANYCLASS · ILLUSTRATION · ART165 · ARTI220 · ARTCOLORTHEOR · ART100 · ARTD220 · ARTI100 · 74 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
26%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you need a specific art credit and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh critiquesTough graderUnclear instructionsLate or absentPolarizing personality
  • Recent students report mocking , and .
  • Studio art and color theory demand expensive materials and strict aesthetic preferences with little creative freedom.
  • Older or self-directed art students sometimes praise her industry knowledge; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students still earn A or B, but , and harsh critiques make high marks feel earned under stress.

Online and ; online adds late grades and vague prompts.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content ranges from easy art history tests to demanding studio work with expensive media and perfectionist standards.

; older art history sections were lighter with open-note tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Many reviews warn not to miss class; she singles out absences even when emails were sent.

; online still tracks presence for some sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Would-take-again sits near 26% with a wave of recent 1-star reviews urging students to pick anyone else.

Online and ; a minority of older in-person fans still praise her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate; critiques are condescending and .

Format shift

Harshness is strongest in recent in-person studio reviews; online also reports critical late grading.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of projects, gouache swatches, sketching, and materials cost pile up with constant revision pressure.

Format shift

Online and and project load.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Frequent claims she does not teach, rambles off topic, arrives late, or leaves students to YouTube.

Format shift

In-person complaints about mockery and lateness; online about absence and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Studio projects and critiques drive grades; art history sections use a few exams and a paper.

Format shift

Studio formats are project-based; ART100 history is test and paper light.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio and survey classes are often called harsh, rant-heavy, and .

Main concern

Public mockery in while she is late, and .

What students said

“Don't be fooled by her good ratings, most of them are from 2004-2016. if possible unless you want to be belittled in every class you have with her.”
ANYCLASS
“she is very harsh to students and will openly mock you if you miss a day of class”
ARTD220

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

a few call work straightforward, many cite , and absentee teaching.

Main concern

, and expensive medium requirements with little teaching.

What students said

“Professor gives assignments last minute. Instructions are vague & poorly explained, usually a few sentences long.”
ART200
“She has been absent for most of the semester, and I have not learned a lot.”
ARTD150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Studio ; some survey classes use open-note midterms and a paper.

Project critiquesSubjective gradingOpen-note history testsFew high-stakes exams

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person studio work is critique-driven; older ART100 comments mention midterm, final, and open notes.

Harsh critiquesMidterm and final in ART100Open notes on some tests
“There was one midterm, a final, and a .”
ART100
“Easy A. 1 midterm, 1 final, & 1 personal paper. She allows you to use notes & study guide on the tests.”
ART100

Online

Online reviews focus on vague project instructions and late .

Project-basedVague instructionsLate grading
“Instructions are vague & poorly explained, usually a few sentences long.”
ART200
“The and overall not too bad!”
ARTCOLORTHEOR

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't be fooled by her good ratings, most of them are from 2004-2016. if possible unless you want to be belittled in every class you have with her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (9 online, 41 in person), weighting recent studio complaints against older praise. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Harsh Critiques

24/100

“she is very harsh to students and will openly mock you if you miss a day of class or if you couldn't understand what the .”

📉 Teaching Gaps

30/100

“I seriously feel like I missed out on so much to be learned. Especially with Motion design. I had to use google more than anything for help.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

26/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes on random rants while teaching and gets annoyed if you cannot follow what she wants
  • She barely is even in class, late to classes
  • Rather than teaching us what we were supposed to learn about, she would right one or 2 sentences on it then show an example and have us figure it out ourselves.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Is overall an ok class, just make sure you follow her directions fully without any creative freedom.
  • Stressful classes; You never feel like you're doing anything right.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • Poor class lectures, harsh with critiques and is often condescending to her students.
  • Trans students beware, she showed legal names on screenshare & went on a rant abt gender.
  • Don't miss any classes or and be more harsh to your work and grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

74

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with a , and both formats covered support high confidence despite polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 524
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 521

Course coverage

ARTI2209 reviews
ART1007 reviews
ART2007 reviews
ANYCLASS6 reviews
ARTD1505 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ARTI2104 reviews
ARTD2203 reviews
ARTI1003 reviews
ART2202 reviews
ARTCOLORTHEOR2 reviews
ART1651 review
ILLUSTRATION1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 15

B range

21

B+ 2 · B 19

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5