AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Patrick Nunally

ENGR210 · ENGR126 · ENRG126 · ENGR210L · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
95%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a challenging EE course with a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational EE MentorLight Grader on Hard ContentIndustry-ConnectedLots of HomeworkDeeply Student-Invested
  • Extremely high recommendation with .
  • Course content and exams are hard, but and .
  • Expect , and real personal investment from the professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As because he is a and cares about understanding, but exams and content still demand real study.

Online reviews describe easier non-proctored exams; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Circuit and EE topics are dense, fast, and often require outside videos and research to keep up.

In-person difficulty comments dominate; the few online notes sound lighter.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and skip-class tags appear, though some labs allow more flexibility.

Evidence is mostly in-person; online as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Near-universal would-take-again sentiment cites inspiration, industry knowledge, and genuine student investment.

and volume from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students repeatedly call him an easy or .

Format shift

In-person comments drive this; online mainly notes grades come from few items.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of homework and outside study are common, especially in ENGR210-style courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students describe , and rare personal investment in learning.

Format shift

In-person praise is overwhelming; online is still positive with fewer details.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades often rest on a few exams and .

Format shift

Online explicitly grades mainly exams and labs; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and exam-heavy, but Nunally is widely praised as , and a light grader who cares that students learn.

Main concern

Lectures can feel short or , so success often requires outside study and .

What students said

“Greatest human I've ever met who isn't a relative, and , and inspirational”
ENGR210L
“Exams were always extremely difficult but it helps that he was a and ”
ENGR210
“If you need help, he spots and will chase after you until you get it.”
ENGR210

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections felt easier with non-proctored multiple-choice exams and .

Main concern

Grades may , so you must track your own standing.

What students said

“ , and . Non-proctored.”
ENGR126
“I learned more in this class than in any class Ive ever taken.”
ENGR126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often very hard and time-pressured in person, but and online formats can be non-proctored multiple choice.

Hard timed examsLight grading on examsGraded by few thingsNon-proctored online MC

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and time-consuming, sometimes with multi-hour windows, but grading stays relatively light.

Extremely difficult examsLong exam windowsTest heavyLight grader
“ but it helps that he was a ”
ENGR210
“60% of your grade is based on 2 exams, both of which are impossible to do well on”
ENGR210

Online

Online exams described as multiple choice and non-proctored, with .

Multiple choice examsNon-proctoredLabs count toward grade
“ , and . Non-proctored.”
ENGR126

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will make you want to convert to EE as your new major, and I'm studying for Aero!”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting inspiration, hard content, and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Many professors teach, few can inspire the next generation of engineers to advance society.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ !”

⚖️

78/100

“overall an and ”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“There is a lot of hw but that is expected.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is one of .
  • Incredibly knowledgeable and an outstanding professor.
  • Ill always remember and be thankful to Dr. Nunally

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but it helps that he was a
  • second half was extremely difficult to follow along with the lectures
  • This class requires doing a lot of personal learning

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , and inspirational
  • He really cared if people learned.
  • he seems to be really invested in his classes learning

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

20 recent detailed reviews with strong consistency on care, difficulty, and recommendation support high confidence.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR21010 reviews
ENGR1265 reviews
ENRG1263 reviews
ENGR210L2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values