AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kimberly Christensen

MATH141 · MATH54 · MATH115 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH100 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
26.09%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProYouTube Not Live TeachingHarsh Exam GraderHeavy Ungraded HomeworkSelf-Taught MathInflexible Deadlines
  • Most students say the .
  • and are graded with extreme format pickiness.
  • yet frequently ungraded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Harsh exam formatting and answers are mathematically correct.

; online adds tech and timing failures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Math content plus self-teaching and nitpicky work requirements make the class feel harder than the catalog level.

Online self-teaching complaints are especially strong.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

62/100

as not mandatory, especially online, though some in-person classes require presence.

; in-person is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and and formats.

Negative consensus is strong online and still majority in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students report calculator-format steps even with correct answers.

Format shift

and in-person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Large volumes of homework and of frequent exams.

Format shift

and also appears in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant story is third-party videos and self-teaching, with only a and caring.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is especially low; a .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades rest , while homework is practice and .

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reactions are still , though a minority praise clear notes, care, and .

Main concern

Even with and workload can tank GPA.

What students said

“she grades your exams like she's searching for any possible ”
MATH115
“She is a great professor. She teaches the material in ”
MATH115
“ ”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely described as , and harsh timed tests, sometimes taken in a testing center.

Main concern

Little original instruction plus zero-tolerance late or .

What students said

“All her lectures were YouTube videos from other professors”
MATH110
“ . The teacher doesn't teach anything you are self-teaching by watching YouTube videos.”
MATH110
“ 1 hour allowed, or she will not grade.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent, timed, format-strict, and carry most of the grade, with little mercy for process differences.

Test heavyStrict show-your-work formatTimed examsMath Center testing onlinePartial revision sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as mercilessly graded with required exact methods and heavy point docks for small misses.

Harsh show-work gradingTest heavySpecific answer format required
“she grades your exams like she's searching for any possible ”
MATH141
“ if you are okay doing a test, getting one question wrong out of 20, and getting a B- on the test.”
MATH115

Online

Online courses often require timed Math Center or , and refuse late tech submissions.

In-person Math Center exams1-hour limitShow work her way onlyLate submissions refused
“ 1 hour allowed, or she will not grade.”
MATH110
“she was just not going to accept it, so she gave me a big 0”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid. Avoid. . She is horrible and does not teach the math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, emphasizing self-teaching, exam harshness, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“You can't be a professor and not teach a thing.”

✂️

14/100

“She is THE ”

📚

22/100

“Basically a self taught class”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“ if you want a good GPA.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Half of her Lessons are just links to other teachers old youtube videos
  • , just youtube videos.
  • She understands the material, cares about her students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she marked that question wrong for lack of work
  • tons of
  • You will learn from random youtube videos

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Flexibility

  • , and no effort to accommodate
  • she is ridiculously unfair
  • Super flexible if you communicate with her, beyond reasonable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with large online and in-person samples and highly consistent self-teach plus harsh-grader themes yield high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 55
3 out of 512
2 out of 512
1 out of 540

Course coverage

MATH11020 reviews
MATH1159 reviews
MATH608 reviews
1106 reviews
1152 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1002 reviews
MATH542 reviews
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

10

C+ 5 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 3