AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Netta Schroer

PSYC100 · PSYCH120 · PSY230 · PSYC120 · PSYCH230 · PSYC71143 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
86.84%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want rigorous preparation and will use office hours; avoid if you need an easy A or flexibility.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorTough graderDetailed feedbackHeavy research papersSkip class and fail
  • but she prepares students well for upper-division psych.
  • and office-hour help if you stay on schedule.
  • Online sections draw harsher reviews about inflexibility and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

As are possible but require consistent reading, drafts, quizzes, and .

Online reviews emphasize zero flexibility; for A/B grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Research Methods is dense, fast-paced, and and SPSS-style work.

Both formats call the content hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most and skipping means falling behind.

and you will not pass; online is more assignment-driven.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

86/100

and transfer prep, despite workload and toughness.

In-person recommendations dominate; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Frequent tough-grader tags, no curve, and .

Format shift

Online late-work zeros and ; in person still strict but .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Two major research papers, weekly quizzes, group work, and .

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework; in person adds group projects and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise passionate lectures, clear expectations, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching quality is excellent; online is more mixed and impersonal.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grade blend of , and final.

Format shift

In ; online leans quizzes, discussions, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is widely loved as a but supports success.

Main concern

Heavy papers, quizzes, and .

What students said

“She cares deeply about all her students and wants everyone to succeed. She gives countless opportunities for help and support if needed.”
PSY230
“SHE IS THE BEST! If you are dreading taking research methods she makes it so fun.”
PSYCH230
“Netta is hands down the !”
PSY230

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students , and a self-taught feel with mixed outcomes.

Main concern

Inflexible late-work policy and limited human support can tank grades even for strong students.

What students said

“Professor Schroer does not have a human side. If you're dying of cancer she won't accept anything late.”
PSYC120
“And your pretty much teaching yourself the material and she made me feel dumb for asking for help.”
PSY230
“She is a . She is extremely critical even when you based your presentation off her powerpoints and the book.”
PSYC120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and reading; not open-book friendly in most reports.

Two major examsWeekly quizzesTest heavyLecture and reading based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lecture-vocab testing with standard difficulty.

Two examsWeekly quizzesTest heavyLecture vocab tested
“There are 2 research papers and 2 tests that can be difficult, but Netta is always willing to help.”
PSY230
“There are and 2 exams to take but Nettas lectures and !”
PSYCH230

Online

Online comments mention midterm and .

Midterm and finalReading quizzesCritical final presentation
“Only 2 big exams (a midterm and final)”
PSYC120
“She is a .”
PSYC120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Netta is hands down the best professor I have had at Palomar! I took her PSYCH 120 and her PSYCH 230, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting teaching quality, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“SHE IS THE BEST! If you are dreading taking research methods she makes it so fun.”

📝

90/100

“ and presentations!”

📚 Workload Reality

26/100

“Be prepared to read and write a lot. If you are taking this class make sure you have a light schedule.”

👍 Recommendation

86/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures also are great! She cares a lot about what she teaches
  • shes super funny and has lots of life stories to share
  • She is incredibly knowledgable in Psychology

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Psych-230 was the most difficult class I've ever taken
  • This course was difficult!
  • and there are no exceptions

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares deeply about all her students and wants everyone to succeed
  • she is so
  • Netta truly goes above and beyond to help her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

46 detailed reviews spanning 2015-2025 with , and in-person strength.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH23020 reviews
PSY23015 reviews
PSYC1205 reviews
2302 reviews
PSYCH1202 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PSYC1001 review
PSYC711431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

14

B+ 7 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values