AI Rate Professor

Art

Ingram Ober

ART103 · SOC007 · ART101 · ART105 · ART240 · ART102 · ART280 · ART260 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if and can tolerate disorganization and late grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized but kindLate end-of-term gradingProject-based art studioEasy grader when presentRambling lectures
  • Many students call him kind and passionate about art
  • Organization and
  • if you put in studio time, but instruction quality varies

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades often land at A with few graded items if .

Both formats report easy passing; online students especially call it an EZ pass despite frustration.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

as low conceptual difficulty, though materials and time demands can still stress beginners.

In-person and online comments both describe easy content with uneven instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance is often optional or flexible, but and stay on track.

Many recent in-person and ; others say yes for structured sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

; kindness and easy grades clash with weak organization and teaching.

Online polarity is sharp; critics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students frequently report easy grading and few graded items, with harshness rarely the main complaint.

Format shift

Lenient outcomes appear across formats even when students dislike instruction.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Several projects and , but overall difficulty scores stay low and graded items are few.

Format shift

Online reviews more often mention lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

He is repeatedly called kind and knowledgeable, yet disorganization, rambling, and .

Format shift

In-person ART105 studio praise is warmer than many online ART101/102 critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades revolve around a small set of art projects and mini assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects as the bulk of the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and easy for self-driven students, but many criticize rambling lectures, lateness, and sparse guidance.

Main concern

Disorganization and limited critique can .

What students said

“ on projects”
ART105
“ and spends most of the class talking about himself”
ART101
“The semester is almost over and he hasn't graded a ”
ART102

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews split between fun project inspiration and , and weak organization.

Main concern

Late grading and the end.

What students said

“Zoom lectures were very interesting and overall a great professor”
ART102
“ week, so you had no idea how you were doing until it was too late”
ART101
“Didnt grade a single thing til the end of the sem despite repeating that he would”
ART105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little evidence of formal exams.

Project-based gradingFew graded itemsNo exam emphasis

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and studio work, sometimes with only a few major pieces.

3-4 major projectsStudio timeGraded by few things
“He has a set amount of grade”
ART101
“The class was purely projects in which he would spend a whole class showing us examples”
ART105

Online

Online comments describe project work and .

ProjectsLate gradingFew checkpoints
“Didnt grade a single thing til the end of the sem despite repeating that he would”
ART105
“There are lots of and express yourself”
ART102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hes a cool guy but disorganized. Hard to reach outside of class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting kindness versus disorganization and project-based easiness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧩 Organization Problems

35/100

“ and haven't learned anything.”

🎨 Hands-on Studio Help

70/100

“ on projects, gives great advice”

😊 Easy Pass Potential

78/100

“Incredibly nice and accommodating, though. EZ pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He reads from scripted lectures that he's typed out already
  • Powerpoints are mainly just examples of other artists
  • good balance of lecture and projects

Theme 2

⏱️ About Organization and Grading

  • and does not post your grade until the very end
  • he hasn't graded a

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • He is a very sweet person, and loves his work and students
  • He's a , but not the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews span many years with mixed detail; themes of kindness and disorganization are consistent but older comments dilute recency.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART10211 reviews
ART1015 reviews
ART1055 reviews
ART1032 reviews
ART2401 review
Show 3 more courses
ART2601 review
ART2801 review
SOC0071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 9

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3