AI Rate Professor

English

Donna Potratz

ENG10 · ENGL50 · ENGL100 · ENG201 · ENGLISH100 · ENG803 · ENG202 · ENG100 · ENG50 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a and are willing to read, write, and show up consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorLots of reading and homeworkEssay rewrites allowedParticipation mattersClear feedback
  • Most students say she cares deeply and .
  • Expect and ; staying current is the real path to a solid grade.
  • Many report essay rewrites, , and flexibility when you communicate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As or B+s , and using rewrites, but effort is required and some call her a .

Evidence ; the single online review also reported a B+ with solid effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is college English with substantial reading, but most students say concepts are manageable if you keep up.

In-person reviews span easy to moderate difficulty; the one online but enjoyable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, and participation often counts toward the grade.

; online evidence is too thin to reassess policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About four in , and real writing growth despite the workload.

Recommendation tone is strong in recent in-person reviews; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students frequently mention rewrites, late-work flexibility, , and fair recovery if you communicate.

Format shift

Leniency claims come mainly from in-person comments; online data is limited to one positive review.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tags and comments repeatedly cite lots of , and essays due nearly every class.

Format shift

Heavy workload language appears across in-person reviews; the online .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most , and growth-focused, though older and some mid-era reviews criticize overload or unfairness.

Format shift

Positive teaching praise is concentrated in in-person reviews; the online review also found the class fun and supportive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation, with multiple students saying there are no traditional exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy structure is described almost exclusively in in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections dominate; students highlight , and frequent essay work with rewrites.

Main concern

Attendance is often mandatory and the if you procrastinate.

What students said

“This class has no exams, and she assigns great essays to read and review and .”
ENG100
“She was super lenient with late submissions. , and genuinely wants to see her students grow.”
ENG202
“She gives out a lot of hw at least 1-2 assignments due each class day.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One online ENG100 review , and helpful office hours.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence about online workload and structure.

What students said

“I was worried about being lost in an online class but and .”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are typically essay and many students find more manageable.

No traditional examsEssay-based gradingRewrites allowedParticipation graded

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and often no exams rather than high-stakes testing.

No examsMultiple essaysHomework every classEssay rewrites
“This class has no exams, and she assigns great essays to read and review and .”
ENG100
“Great teacher. . .”
ENG100

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ academic performance. If you stay on top of your work you can easily get a B+.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and grading flexibility. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

78/100

“ , and genuinely wants to see her students grow.”

📚

32/100

“She gives out a lot of hw at least 1-2 assignments due each class day.”

📝 Rewrite-Friendly Grades

72/100

“You can redo the essays as many times as you want until you get the grade you want.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

80/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very kind. Wants . Pushes you.
  • Her constant care for your growth in writing was inspirational
  • She made English 100 very fun and wants students to succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you stay on top of your work you can easily get a B+.
  • You should get an A if you show up and do the .
  • Also an .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Lots of homework
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and , and essay rewrites support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 59
3 out of 510
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG10030 reviews
ENGL1004 reviews
ENGLISH1004 reviews
ENG103 reviews
ENG2023 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG503 reviews
ENG2011 review
ENG8031 review
ENGL501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2