AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cassondra Lochard

MATH127 · MATH30 · MATH15 · MATH60 · MATH110 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you already know algebra well and can teach yourself from videos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't TeachFlipped Classroom VideosHarsh GraderMumbles Through LecturesHomework Overload
  • Most students say she relies on old online videos and barely teaches in person.
  • credit, and many drops or failing grades.
  • A small and builds real understanding if you already know the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and many F or drop grades make an A rare without already knowing the material.

Almost all ; the single online review was a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Algebra and precalc content is already hard, and poor live teaching plus self-study videos make it feel much harder.

Difficulty ; the online summer section mainly complained about volume of work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, and the flipped model still expects students in class even when lectures are videos.

Attendance notes come almost entirely from in-person Math110 and MATH127 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Would-take-again is about 11 percent, and most comments urge students to pick any other professor.

Recommendation tone is consistently negative across the 30 in-person reviews and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and hard uncurved tests dominate student reports.

Format shift

; online evidence is too thin to compare.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and multi-hour daily study are common complaints.

Format shift

The online summer review flags extreme weekly hours; and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students say she mumbles, uses outdated videos, answers poorly, and leaves them teaching themselves.

Format shift

Teaching quality critiques .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy tags, hard exams without notes, and as the grade driver.

Format shift

; online review focused on homework volume before dropping.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe flipped videos instead of , and .

Main concern

Students who need live instruction report learning nothing and failing or withdrawing.

What students said

“She did not teach anything. She mumbled and wrote small things on the board.”
Math110
“ during the exams.”
Math110
“She uses these to teach well not teach again we watch the videos and teach ourselves”
Math110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is a summer Math110 drop citing 20+ hours of weekly work and .

Main concern

Summer pace plus heavy homework can force a fully shows.

What students said

“It requires basically 3-4 hours a day for this class alone making it at least 20 hours of work per week.”
Math110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students describe and little guidance.

No Notes AllowedHard In-Person ExamsNo Study GuideLittle Partial CreditTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard, often without notes, sticky notes, or study guides.

No NotesNo Sticky NoteNo Prior Study GuideHard TestsHarsh Scoring
“ during the exams. No prior study guide.”
Math110
“ .”
Math110

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She did not teach anything. She mumbled and wrote small things on the board.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Teaching was the one thing this teacher did not do.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ !”

🧪

22/100

“ at each other for help.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“Extremely hard class with tons of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She mumbled and wrote small things on the board.
  • She does not teach. Period.
  • relies in online resources to do it for her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • will do anything she can to grade as harshly as possible
  • Most of the class ended up dropping.

Theme 3

🎥 About Flipped Videos

  • assigned youtube videos to watch that were recorded from another teacher
  • we watch the videos and teach ourselves
  • Hybrid format where you teach yourself before class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

31 detailed reviews across several years show consistent themes of poor teaching, heavy work, and .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 520

Course coverage

Math11017 reviews
MATH1275 reviews
1353 reviews
MATH153 reviews
MATH602 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2