AI Rate Professor

English

Lisette Lasater

ENG205 · ENG203 · ENG210 · ENG202 · ENG100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can—she is a and rewarding.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorExcellent essay feedbackClear grading criteriaNo textbook requiredSafe fun classroom
  • Near-universal 5-star praise with 100% would-take-again across English courses.
  • Grades center on a and flexible support.
  • , but weekly work builds you into the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Most students earn A or A+ by showing up, finishing scaffolded essays on time, and .

Both online and effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and literature with progressive difficulty, not abstract theory.

In-person and online both describe fun material with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

; a few say optional, and skipping can hurt.

Evidence is mostly in-person; as required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and many call her the .

Recommendation is equally strong online and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, and help students succeed.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Light

68/100

; no expensive textbooks.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and rare at Palomar.

Format shift

Praise is consistent in both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade , and class assignments rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and scaffolding that keeps essays from feeling overwhelming.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and .”
ENG202
“ .”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online ENG202/205 students call her passionate, approachable, and flexible on deadlines with .

Main concern

; plan time for writing.

What students said

“Lasater is the ”
ENG202
“Can be flexible on deadlines if you ask. .”
ENG202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little evidence of strict proctored exams.

Essay-based assessmentFew or no traditional examsFeedback-driven revisions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

analysis essays with class scaffolding.

Three major essaysIn-class work builds to papers
“be prepared for analysis essays -- there were 3 large ones that make up the majority of your grade.”
ENG202

Online

Online reviews emphasize papers and feedback; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is mentioned.

Multi-page papersFlexible deadlines when asked
“It's an English class, there are several 5 or 6 page papers.”
ENG202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (5 online, 11 in , and near-universal recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⭐ Teaching Excellence

96/100

“ .”

💬

92/100

“she also gave plenty of how you could improve.”

❤️ Student Care

95/100

“She is willing to work with you and any complications life throws your way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she makes
  • she made the class really fun and I felt like it was a very safe space
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📝

  • 3 essays in total and an annotated bibliography
  • and
  • As long as you put in effort and do the

Theme 3

💖 About Character

  • one of the sweetest professors
  • very caring and considerate
  • professors like her are rare

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

16 detailed reviews from 2020-2025 with near-perfect consistency on teaching quality and recommendation.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2029 reviews
ENG2053 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG2031 review
ENG2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1