AI Rate Professor

Trade & Industry

Erin Behling

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

to unreliable grading and feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent gradingSparse feedbackFairness concernsGraded by few things
  • Only one review exists, and it .
  • Student says most assignments were ignored while one was graded.
  • Perceived unfair treatment and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

With most work allegedly ignored and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty rating is mid, but the single review focuses on grading fairness rather than content hardness.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

The as not mandatory.

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The sole student warns that fair treatment and .

No online recommendation data.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Student reports inconsistent grading with most assignments left ungraded.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload volume is unclear; .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

and unfair help rather than effective teaching.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears assignment-based, but .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person review , and unfair help patterns.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Only one of , and the rest were ignored.”
100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want fair treatment and for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited corroboration. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

15/100

“Only one of , and the rest were ignored.”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“If you want fair treatment and for you.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • the rest were ignored
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

One recent review with strong claims but no corroboration across courses or time.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1