AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nirmala Kashyap

MATH100 · MATHMATH · MATH115 · STATSC1000 · MATH15 · MATH53 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH10 · MATHALG · MATH50 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can keep up with and dense lectures; otherwise look for a clearer math instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkLecture heavyPolarizing teachingMandatory attendanceClear grading criteria
  • Student opinions and rushed, hard-to-follow lectures.
  • and dense lectures dominate; .
  • , and using practice tests is the main path to passing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Homework and can lift grades, but exams are frequently described as hard and .

Online reviews stress hard on-campus or high-stakes tests; warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty is high and students often say lectures move fast through dense material with .

Both formats report challenging content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping lectures tanks the grade.

Evidence is mostly from in-person classes; online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but strong avoid-her warnings from struggling students keep the overall recommendation cautious.

Online sample is small and warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria and help, yet tough-grader and hard-test comments .

Format shift

Online students mainly complain about hard tests; and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of and test-heavy tags appear repeatedly across courses.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Some students feel supported with feedback and practice tests; many others find lectures rushed, unclear, or .

Format shift

Recent online comments are kinder; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

while midterms and finals still heavily decide the .

Format shift

Online sections use MyMathLab-style homework plus on-campus or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and fair if you attend and , while many say lectures rush, accent and pace hurt learning, and homework is overwhelming.

Main concern

Rushed lectures, thick accent complaints, and .

What students said

“Havent took a Math class in over 4 years she made it too easy... Easy A”
MATH50
“IF YOU STRUGGLE WITH MATH AT .”
MATH60
“ ”
math100
“ of problems per section.”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report a caring instructor with clear online systems, but on-campus exams and practice.

Main concern

even when the online platform feels manageable.

What students said

“Professor Kashyap was great. .”
MATH110
“homework and because you can use notes but as for the .”
MATH50
“4 Exams are given on campus. .”
MATH50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests, with practice tests helping but still feeling high-stakes.

Open note testsHard exams vs homeworkOn-campus exams for onlinePractice tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests, but also multiple-choice tests that still require shown work and feel hard.

Open note testsPractice testsShow work on multiple choiceHard tests
“ ”
math100
“ but must show work or .”
MATH53

Online

and quizzes can use notes, but and some exams are on campus.

Notes allowed on homework/quizzesHard testsOn-campus exams
“homework and because you can use notes but as for the .”
MATH50
“4 Exams are given on campus. .”
MATH50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IF YOU STRUGGLE WITH MATH AT . She is the ! Doesn't help you the slightest bit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting homework load, polarized teaching, and grade paths. Credibility rating: High.

📚

28/100

“ of problems per section.”

🎯 Teaching Clarity

46/100

“when it came to lectures it felt like she would rush through sections without going in-depth of explaining it.”

⚖️ Grade Path

52/100

“ , and you will pass. and manages time very well.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“Havent took a Math class in over 4 years she made it too easy... Easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • rush through sections without going in-depth of explaining it
  • Thick accent, that is all I can say. Good person, but bad teacher.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • got a C & D but overall did well in class with .
  • Easy A, there was a lot of individuals who hardly ever showed up

Theme 3

📝

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Class is also mandatory!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

32 reviews span many years with rich detail and , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH609 reviews
MATH1104 reviews
MATH154 reviews
MATH504 reviews
math1002 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH532 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
1101 review
MATH101 review
MATH1151 review
MATHALG1 review
StatsC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 6 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1