AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

James Eighmey

ANTHR101 · ANTHR110 · ANTH101 · ANTHRO110 · ANTHLAB · ANTH215 · ANTH100 · ANTH105 · ANTH101L · ANTH · ANTHROPOLOGY110 · ANTH7001 · ANTH110 · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Prefer him only for in-person hands-on anthro if you will read the book yourself; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized onlinePassionate but ramblingRead the textbookHands-on labs strongPolarizing lecturer
  • , and hands-on anthropology labs.
  • Online and vague discussions.
  • Success usually requires reading the book hard because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many report As if they read the book, attend, and use , but .

and ; in-person As are common with textbook study.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable for interested students but lectures are and .

Online feels harder due to chaos; and more fun.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and warn that skipping hurts you.

but and quiz work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

About half the students love the passion and hands-on work; the .

In-person recommendations are mixed-positive; online recommendations are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some praise and study guides; others call him a .

Format shift

Online discussion grading is frequently called harsh; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly quizzes, multi-exam structure, heavy reading, plus labs or discussions depending on section.

Format shift

Online has discussion and navigation load; and lecture note demands.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes engaging, but , and weak online.

Format shift

In-person teaching has real fans; online teaching quality is widely panned.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes, midterms, finals, and as side weight.

Format shift

Online leans discussions plus quizzes; and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and passion, while others hate tangents, mumbling, and .

Main concern

Lectures go off topic and unless you rely heavily on the textbook.

What students said

“Hands on, get ready to get dirty!”
ANTHLAB
“This professor is terrible. and rude!”
ANTH100
“Such a fun teacher. Has a really unique way of teaching class.”
ANTH100

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience is poorly organized with , and harsh discussion grading.

Main concern

Course shell, deadlines, and terms.

What students said

“Course is VERY disorganized, .”
ANTH100
“Entire course very disorganized, random deadlines in the middle of the week”
ANTH100
“ !!”
ANTH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard and often textbook-heavy; some students report very low class means and tricky questions.

Book-based examsWeekly quizzesStudy guidesLow exam averages reported

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final; success depends on reading and notes more than lecture alone.

Weekly quizzesMultiple midtermsFinal examStudy guides
“Weekly quizzes, 3 midterms and a final.”
ANTH100
“you need to read the textbook in order to pass the exams.”
ANTH101

Online

Online finals and quizzes are posted inconsistently; little evidence of webcam proctoring, but organization issues dominate.

QuizzesFinal examDiscussion posts
“ and due on a Saturday”
ANTH100
“the quizzes werent open until about 2 weeks ago”
ANTH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Course is VERY disorganized, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, contrasting stronger in-person lab experiences with consistently poor online organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ and rude! He tells you to ask questions but when you do, he is condescending.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

45/100

“I dont understand all these bad reviews. I didn't read book, just paid attention and went to class.”

🗂️ Organization Issues

25/100

“Entire course very disorganized, random deadlines in the middle of the week”

📖 Textbook Dependence

60/100

“If and study the textbook youll do well”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hands on, get ready to get dirty!
  • goes on a lot of tangents in his lectures
  • His lectures are full of rich content and he REALLY knows his stuff

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • you essentially have to teach yourself

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Read the book for an A
  • The average mean on all the exams was lower than 60
  • Gives out as many points of as there are in the course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a and strong online disorganization complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 57
3 out of 511
2 out of 59
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ANTH10017 reviews
ANTH11012 reviews
ANTH1015 reviews
1104 reviews
ANTH1053 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ANTH1 review
ANTH101L1 review
ANTH2151 review
ANTH70011 review
ANTHLAB1 review
ANTHR1011 review
ANTHR1101 review
ANTHRO1101 review
ANTHROPOLOGY1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values