AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shelbi Hathaway

MATH110 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if and stay locked in every class day.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnique Grading SystemDaily Quizzes/TestsRetest OpportunitiesPolarizing ReviewsTest Heavy
  • Her mastery-style grading can be lenient once understood, including retests to prove knowledge.
  • Daily quizzes/tests and and high-pressure.
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who thrive under the system and those who call it chaotic or unfair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is reachable if you master the retest-friendly system and put in daily work, but it is not automatic.

Evidence is in-person only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Frequent quizzes/tests and dense homework make the course .

Only in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many students report and daily assessments that punish absence.

A minority of as not mandatory, but daily testing still pressures presence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and help; critics report boring lectures, favoritism, and failed outcomes.

All in-person; reviews are nearly 50/50.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Supporters say the system rewards effort and mastery with retests; critics still call the system terrible if they never grasp it.

Format shift

In-person only; opinion depends on whether students decode the rules.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

high, continuous workload.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and support; others say lectures are boring, homework mismatches class, and office hours disappoint.

Format shift

In-person only; highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

as essential practice.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All MATH110 evidence is in person; and surviving frequent testing.

Main concern

Misunderstanding the can tank the grade fast.

What students said

“Every single semester I and it leads them to fail the course. UNDERSTAND. HER. GRADING. SYSTEM.”
MATH110
“Although there is a and prove you know the material if you do not do well.”
MATH110
“One of the worst professors I have ever had. and her office hours are pretty much the same way.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is frequent and high-stakes day to day, but retests can soften a bad first attempt for students who stay engaged.

Daily quizzes/testsRetest optionsHomework-aligned practiceIn-person assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person MATH110 uses near-daily quizzes/tests; some students can retest to show mastery.

Daily quizzesRetestsTest heavy
“Although there is a and prove you know the material if you do not do well.”
MATH110
“the the test but they were hard.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“UNDERSTAND. HER. GRADING. SYSTEM. Once you understand the system, you'll see just how lenient the class is.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting the , and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She had unique board writing to make the theory work more understandable.”

⚖️

66/100

“She has a and allows students multiple opportunities to show mastery.”

🔥 Daily Testing Pressure

28/100

“The so if you didnt understand it after the one or two days of it being taught basically you were screwed.”

👎 Strong Dissent

15/100

“ . Shelbi picked on me specifically for no reason.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shelbi is criminally underrated here
  • Her lectures are boring and she makes favorites
  • She's my awesome math professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you can retest and prove you know the material
  • the class
  • You get the grade you put in the work and effort to get

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload & Support

  • they need to devote a good amount of time to the class
  • Her student hours was everyone sitting in a classroom silently helping each other while
  • I definitely reccomend attending her office hours

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but extreme polarization yield medium credibility.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1109 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values