AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Martha Martinez

MATH200 · MATH141 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH50 · 162 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
47.17%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already self-teach well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderQuiz and Exam HeavyDisorganized LecturesYouTube-Reliant TeachingLow Grade Cushion
  • Grades are often based and .
  • Many students describe picky, harsh grading and .
  • Older reviews are kinder, but math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A usually demands near-perfect performance on quizzes and .

Both formats report harsh quiz/test weighting; online often mentions very low class means.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

and method-specific grading make courses feel harder than the catalog level suggests.

In-person and online both describe fast pacing and tough assessments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and daily or weekly quizzes that effectively require showing up.

Online and in-person both lean mandatory; a few older notes differ.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

and unforgiving grading, despite a minority of positive older reviews.

Online reviews are mostly negative; in-person is mixed historically but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; students report picky methods, little partial credit, and D-range quiz/test averages.

Format shift

and in-person recent reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Weekly quizzes, frequent exams, and large homework loads create .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many students say lectures jump around, rely on YouTube, or .

Format shift

Online complaints center on video/group self-teaching; in-person complaints center on disorganization and picky methods.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Quizzes and ; and not graded.

Format shift

Strongly consistent across online and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed over time but recent ones emphasize disorganization, tough grading, and not count.

Main concern

because there is and tests.

What students said

“ and exams, making it very hard to succeed if you .”
MATH110
“The average grade for quizzes and one of them.”
MATH110
“ . Grade only based off tests and quizzes.”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw complaints about YouTube-driven instruction, group , and .

Main concern

Weak live teaching plus unforgiving assessments make online especially risky for students who need structure.

What students said

“The mean was 20% for and .”
MATH115
“She doesn't teach, all she does is make her students watch YouTube videos and work in groups.”
MATH60
“Material locked until day of class and then due before end of class. No chance to practice. Little to no guidance. Run.”
MATH60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are frequent, high-stakes, and graded strictly with little cushion or retakes.

Weekly quizzesExam-heavy gradesClosed notes oftenPicky method gradingLow class averages

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and major exams as nearly the entire grade with picky scoring.

Weekly quizzesExam-heavyPicky gradingLittle homework credit
“Quizzes every week and it does not help and when she teaches and ”
MATH110
“This class and quizzes. Quizzes every week and !”
MATH200

Online

Online reports harsh quiz/test grading, material not fully taught, and .

Harsh quiz/test gradingNo retakesContent not fully taught
“The mean was 20% for and .”
MATH115
“The yet, makes simple mathematical errors and errors on the test”
MATH115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would highly recommend you to avoid taking any Math with this professor. and her grading is insanely tough.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (5 online, 45 in and uneven teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She only grades quizzes and exams, making it very hard to succeed if you . Her .”

📉

18/100

“This professor does not care about the answer but rather if it's done in her method. .”

📚

25/100

“Relied on outside YouTube videos for giving us instructions. Did little by way of offering actual lessons on material.”

👍 Minority Positive View

70/100

“Don't let these other posts dissuade you... I've just studied a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaching is not meant for her
  • Relys on Youtube videos from another guy
  • She's a it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • average grade for quizzes and
  • More than half of the class did not pass

Theme 3

⚠️ About Assessment Structure

  • and quizs
  • but make sure to do it
  • and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

162

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years and courses provide a large, detailed sample; recent negative trends are consistent enough for high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 519
3 out of 515
2 out of 529
1 out of 561

Course coverage

MATH11016 reviews
MATH11514 reviews
MATH1415 reviews
MATH2005 reviews
MATH604 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH2453 reviews
MATH503 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

10

C+ 5 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2